How to inspect Js callstack from C++ callstack, I am using visual studio to debugging

2015-06-01 Thread Yonggang Luo
mozjs.dll!js::jit::BaselineScript::icEntryFromPCOffset(unsigned int pcOffset) Line 553 C++ mozjs.dll!js::jit::DebugModeOSRVolatileStub::invalid() Line 56 C++ mozjs.dll!js::jit::DoGetElemFallback(JSContext * cx, js::jit::BaselineFrame * frame, js::jit::ICGetElem_Fallback * stub_, JS::Handle lh

Re: How to inspect Js callstack from C++ callstack, I am using visual studio to debugging

2015-06-01 Thread Philipp Kewisch
Not sure how this works in Visual Studio, but check out: http://www-archive.mozilla.org/scriptable/javascript-stack-dumper.html In gdb you can do "call DumpJSStack()" Philipp ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mo

Re: Intent to remove: mochitest- mach commands

2015-06-01 Thread Andrew Halberstadt
This has now been merged to central. I've update the docs at: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mochitest https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Firefox_OS/Automated_testing/Mochitests In most cases just running |mach mochitest path/to/test/or/dir| will do what you want. But if for some reaso

Re: How to inspect Js callstack from C++ callstack, I am using visual studio to debugging

2015-06-01 Thread R Kent James
On 6/1/2015 2:53 AM, Philipp Kewisch wrote: Not sure how this works in Visual Studio, but check out: http://www-archive.mozilla.org/scriptable/javascript-stack-dumper.html In gdb you can do "call DumpJSStack()" Philipp Here's what I do. After your C++ breakpoint is hit, in Visual Studio do

Re: status-firefox41: affected

2015-06-01 Thread Philip Chee
On 01/06/2015 12:18, glob wrote: > this started happening via > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=972040 > > please file a bug and we'll apply per-product filtering -- currently > it'll be set on any product that has that flag. I have filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?i

Re: Misplaced xpcomglue.lib

2015-06-01 Thread Meenakshi Shankar
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 08:09:55 UTC+5:30, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:38:30AM -0700, Meenakshi Shankar wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We are using Firefox SDKS for our FF extension. The libs generated > > after compiling Firefox 39 beta 1 source (using start-shell-msvc2013) > > did

Re: Misplaced xpcomglue.lib

2015-06-01 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 12:51:23PM -0700, Meenakshi Shankar wrote: > On Thursday, 28 May 2015 08:09:55 UTC+5:30, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:38:30AM -0700, Meenakshi Shankar wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > We are using Firefox SDKS for our FF extension. The libs generated > > >

PSA: Goodbye PR_LOG, hello MOZ_LOG

2015-06-01 Thread Eric Rahm
tl;dr - PR_LOG* are deprecated. Use MOZ_LOG* instead. As part of the effort to improving logging in gecko we've started a transition to using a MOZ prefix and a new set of log levels [1]. I've just landed these changes on mozilla-inbound, if they stick this means you should no longer use PR_LOG

Re: Linked Data and a new Browser API event

2015-06-01 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 5:09 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > We should use whatever formats people are using to mark up pages. If that is > microdata we should use that. If it's RDF we should use that. If its JSONLD > we should use that. > > The API that is used to extract the data is irrelevant. That

Re: Linked Data and a new Browser API event

2015-06-01 Thread Karl Dubost
Benjamin, Le 30 mai 2015 à 21:35, Benjamin Francis a écrit : > But Microdata is only one of the formats widely used on the web today. I'd > like to see some evidence-based discussion on which format(s) we should > support to get the most possible value out of what already exists on the > web. The

Re: Intent to implement and ship: document.execCommand("cut"/"copy")

2015-06-01 Thread dgraham
We enabled native copy-to-clipboard on github.com today for Firefox Nightly visitors. The copy buttons no longer use a Flash widget in Nightly or Chrome! Thanks so much for working on this, Ehsan. David On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 7:42:23 PM UTC-6, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > On 2015-05-06 2:51 PM

Re: Linked Data and a new Browser API event

2015-06-01 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 5:09 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote: >> We should use whatever formats people are using to mark up pages. If that is >> microdata we should use that. If it's RDF we should use that. If its JSONLD >> we should use that. >>

Re: Linked Data and a new Browser API event

2015-06-01 Thread Gordon Brander
On June 1, 2015 at 17:34:48 , Jonas Sicking (jo...@sicking.cc) wrote: > I think we're already talking about reverse-engineering what search > engines and twitter/facebook/etc do. >  > But I'm still all for proper standardization. Including driving > towards good technical solutions. Yup. We’re rea