Mike Hommey wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 06:06:25PM +, Neil wrote:
Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
MSVC 2012 and 2013 can still be used to build Firefox on Windows.
I downloaded the MSVC 2013 Community Edition, but there was no sign of an SDK,
so I downloaded that separately. Is this expecte
Hi,
I just published initial support for pushing to mercurial from git. It's
still experimental and as such I'm looking for volunteers who would want
to try it and confirm that it doesn't break stuff.
See http://glandium.org/blog/?p=3405 for more details.
(Yes, it's a bummer that it only allows
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 10:13:01AM +, Neil wrote:
> Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 06:06:25PM +, Neil wrote:
> >
> >>Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> >>
> >>>MSVC 2012 and 2013 can still be used to build Firefox on Windows.
> >>>
> >>I downloaded the MSVC 2013 Community Edition, but
Mozilla - 2015 Talos performance regression policy
Over the last year and a half the Talos tests have been rewritten to be more
useful and meaningful. This means we need to take them seriously and cannot
just ignore real issues when we don't have time. This does not mean we need to
fix or bac
On Thursday, December 18, 2014 1:08:23 PM UTC+11, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> That being said, if someone wants to add a mach command for this, please
> go ahead by all means. I definitely have no objection.
is there documentation somewhere on how to run the clang-plugin ?
I've installed clang-3.6
Thanks all for the feedback.
I have bug 1109243 filed and have been working on a patch to make this happen.
The one scenario which I don't have a great answer for is comparing to non m-c
branches. This seems critical in order to make better use out of this.
In fact, there is an example push up
Neil wrote:
Mike Hommey wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 06:06:25PM +, Neil wrote:
I downloaded the MSVC 2013 Community Edition, but there was no sign
of an SDK, so I downloaded that separately. Is this expected? If so,
I'll update MDN.
The SDK comes with it.
So you say, but it wasn't
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
> On 12/17/2014 01:27 PM, Martijn wrote:
>> What about where setTimeout is used as a fallback for when some event
>> failed to fire and the mochitest is stalled and the setTimeout is then
>> used to finish the mochitest on time and give some u
> On Dec 17, 2014, at 10:08 PM, James May wrote:
> * Is there telemetry for this?
There isn’t telemetry specifically for non-MJPEG usage of
multipart/x-mixed-replace images. Given that I’ve never seen them used outside
of our test suite, I don’t think we need telemetry to make this particular
On 2014-12-18 9:12 AM, jyaven...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, December 18, 2014 1:08:23 PM UTC+11, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
That being said, if someone wants to add a mach command for this, please
go ahead by all means. I definitely have no objection.
is there documentation somewhere on how to
> On Dec 17, 2014, at 11:47 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
> In contrast, your scenario is:
> - We're expecting that an event *will* fire.
> - We wait a bit to see if it fires.
> - Fail if it the event *does not* fire before the timeout expires.
>
> Here, failures are iffy - they may or may not be "r
Hi,
I am trying to get access to event details (type, target etc.) of runnables
scheduled at nsThread::ProcessNextEvent. I am not sure but it seems like
QueryInterface function can be used but I am having difficulty using it. So
basically I am trying to check if the event runnable to be schedul
tracker bug with details: https://bugzil.la/702
status at: https://treestatus.mozilla.org/
NOTE: the trees will be left open; devs must monitor their own builds,
and retrigger as needed.
IT will be performing maintenance work this Saturday, primarily in SCL3.
That will cause intermittent
On 2014-12-18 5:28 PM, Nils Ohlmeier wrote:
On Dec 17, 2014, at 11:47 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
In contrast, your scenario is:
- We're expecting that an event *will* fire.
- We wait a bit to see if it fires.
- Fail if it the event *does not* fire before the timeout expires.
Here, failures are
Hi
On Friday, December 19, 2014, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> That should be it! The plugin is transparent, unless it finds an error in
> which case you'll get a normal error diagnostic.
>
>
That is weird then. Because I have a patch that fails the Linux64 static
analysis test.
But I can't reproduce
Is the Talos sherriff going to confirm that the backout actually fixed the
regression? If it didn't, can we reland?
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 6:47 AM, jmaher wrote:
>
> Mozilla - 2015 Talos performance regression policy
>
> Over the last year and a half the Talos tests have been rewritten to be
>
Here is the new Gmail calendar information for the weekly Platform
Engineering meeting. If these calendar links don't work, please let me know.
* iCal ics link:
https://www.google.com/calendar/ical/mozilla.com_p51ksu9ddgqt72f0jl21vaq76o%40group.calendar.google.com/public/basic.ics
* Atom/XML
Hi folks,
Bug 701634 has landed and IndexedDB is now available in DedicatedWorker,
SharedWorker, and ServiceWorker. Please file any bugs you find in Core :: DOM :
IndexedDB.
-bent
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://li
On 12/18/14, 2:28 PM, Nils Ohlmeier wrote:
Well there is an event listener waiting for the event to fire.
But how else then through a timeout, obviously with a high timeout value like
30 or 60 seconds
We've had quite a number of random oranges from precisely this scenario.
It seems that it's
19 matches
Mail list logo
