Hi,
I've made some modifications to the Firefox source code and now I would like to
build the install exe on Windows, so that i can normally install Firefox (I
want to couple it with a crawler - http://crawljax.com/). However I would like
that installation to be standard Firefox (and not nightl
Is there any chance we could log in with Persona?
Cheers,
David
On 06/11/14 05:50, Mark Côté wrote:
> A couple months ago I gave a sneak peak into our new repository-based
> code-review tool based on Review Board. I'm excited to announce that
> this tool, now named (descriptively but unimaginat
It looks like all reviews (and patches) are currently public. Is there
some way to have them not be so, for security/confidential bugs/reviews?
~ Gijs
On 06/11/2014 04:50, Mark Côté wrote:
A couple months ago I gave a sneak peak into our new repository-based
code-review tool based on Review Bo
Test Informant report for 2014-11-08.
State of test manifests at revision d380166816dd.
Using revision 0b81c10a9074 as a baseline for comparisons.
Showing tests enabled or disabled between 2014-11-02 and 2014-11-08.
87% of tests across all suites and configurations are enabled.
Summary
---
Unfortunately that's very difficult given the various communication
pathways between hg review repo, the Review Board API, and the BMO API,
especially considering BMO's support of Persona is a bit sketchy. We'll
look into it, but it's not a high priority at the moment.
Mark
On 2014-11-10 5:51 A
That is an excellent point which I forgot to call out: please do NOT try
to use MozReview for confidential/security/nonpublic patches. MozReview
will actually prevent you from publishing a review request linked to a
nonpublic bug. Review Board does not have anything close to the
fine-grained secu
This is awesome, everything seems to be working great so far!
While adapting to mozreview, I also took the opportunity to use hg
bookmarks instead of mq and to switch to a unified repo (m-c, m-i, m-a
etc, all in the same local clone). If anyone else is thinking about
making a similar switch an
Experience shows that many users really, really like all the features of
Session Restore and that we can't easily drop any.
However, if you have references to websites that you haven't visited in
years, that's not normal. Either these websites are still opened in some
tab, or there is a bug in Ses
Hello,
this is a question about the Firefox addon manager and where the
developer of an addon has to put the change log in order to be displayed
after an update of that addon inside the addon manager.
It is unclear how the process of the addon manager being able to
retrieve the change log of an u
I recently build firefox on Ubuntu 14.04 on vmware and when i tried running
test , i got this :http://pastebin.mozilla.org/7217190
In my .mozconfig file, i have only two options:
ac_add_options --enable-debug
ac_add_options --disable-optimize
___
dev-pla
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 01:36:05PM -0800, Chris Peterson wrote:
> On 11/6/14 10:22 AM, Jason Orendorff wrote:
> >I guess I was a little irked that people are still tripping over this
> >ancient document (didn't we delete that?), because I just took the time
> >to clobber most of it and update what
This is https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1053508 . If you can
help glandium debug/reproduce it, that would be awesome.
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Harsh Vardhan wrote:
> I recently build firefox on Ubuntu 14.04 on vmware and when i tried running
> test , i got this :http://pasteb
Harsh said in #introduction that it's the first time he's tried to run
mochitests, and this is a relatively new environment (less than a month,
maybe?).
On 2014-11-09 9:40 PM, Harsh Vardhan wrote:
I recently build firefox on Ubuntu 14.04 on vmware and when i tried running
test , i got this :ht
Yes, I had the same problem in an ubuntu VM. I debugged it with glandium
for a while, but was very busy at the time and eventually cut my losses and
switched tasks. If Harsh has the cycles to play debug-server for glandium,
hopefully they can get to the bottom of this.
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 8:45
On 11/9/14 8:29 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 11/9/14, 11:10 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
We currently only attempt to map each review/commit series to a single
bug.
This is definitely a problem; it serializes workflow such that you have
to get review on bug 1 and land it before you can even request
On 11/10/14, 12:14 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
I think if we land support for specifying the base revision to review
(currently it takes all non-public changesets up to the revision you
specify or . if none), that will be a sufficient stop-gap until proper
multi-bug support is implemented.
Yes, ag
On 11/10/2014 01:44 AM, Josip Maras wrote:
> How can I build a normal, standard Firefox installer for Windows,
> like the one distributed to standard Firefox users?
I don't know the answer to your specific question (I've never personally
had to build the installer), but just as a heads-up: you can
On Monday, November 10, 2014 8:36:36 PM UTC+1, Daniel Holbert wrote:
> On 11/10/2014 01:44 AM, Josip Maras wrote:
> > How can I build a normal, standard Firefox installer for Windows,
> > like the one distributed to standard Firefox users?
>
> I don't know the answer to your specific question (I'v
On Nov 3, 2014, at 1:44 PM, rviti...@mozilla.com wrote:
> In particular Facebook, which practically appears in any top 10 list, had
> (has?) a serious power bug that caused FF to render a hidden spinning wheel.
> Because of this single bug any power benchmark performed by the press, which
> was
If the add-on is hosted on AMO, you just need to enter text into the
Version Notes field when uploading a new version (or editing an existing
one).
Otherwise, you need to specify a value for |em:updateInfoURL|in the
update manifest, which should point to a HTML file on your server.
See the do
In bug 1091921, we got support for using Maybe with the Auto helpers for Mutex
and Monitor - things like MutexAutoLock and MonitorAutoEnter. This supports a
pattern for optionally acquiring a RAII resource that I first saw used in the
JavaScript engine, and which I’ve found very useful since. Fo
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Seth Fowler wrote:
> In bug 1091921, we got support for using Maybe with the Auto helpers for
> Mutex and Monitor - things like MutexAutoLock and MonitorAutoEnter. This
> supports a pattern for optionally acquiring a RAII resource that I first saw
> used in the
Since you are using Nightly it defaults to Nightly. I'm not positive this
covers everything but to make Nightly use a different name you will need
to set MOZ_APP_NAME and MOZ_APP_DISPLAYNAME to the names you want and set
--with-branding=%RELATIVE_PATH_TO_THAT_DIR% and point it to the branding
direc
Note: new meeting time!
The next Memshrink meeting is is brought to you by the replace_malloc tool to
capture and reproduce Firefox's memory allocations:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1083686
The wiki page for this meeting is at:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Performance/MemShrink
On 11/09/2014 06:28 PM, sime.vi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, July 11, 2014 7:38:39 PM UTC+2, Mats Palmgren wrote:
IE10 has -ms-box-decoration-break
I've tested[1] this property in IE11 with the values "slice" and
"clone". IE does not seem to support it. (I've also checked in older
versions
e10s also broke playback of audio streams in MP4 files...
bug 1096717.
Chris P.
On 11/7/2014 1:27 PM, Chris Peterson wrote:
The patch is on mozilla-inbound and ought to hit mozilla-central in
time for tomorrow's Nightly build. \o/
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/a758
26 matches
Mail list logo
