Having previously worked on a couple of GCs I must say this is amazing
work! I don't know many other large, complex code bases such as Gecko
that were moved successfully from a conservative mark-and-sweep
collector to an accurate generational one. Bravo to everyone involved!
Gabriele
On 16/09/20
On 09/16/2014 02:34 PM, Asa Dotzler wrote:
> On 9/16/14, 12:45 PM, Steve Fink wrote:
>> GGC was enabled yesterday (2014-Sep-15) on b2g-inbound with bug 1020751.
>> It has not yet been merged into mozilla-central, but I expect it will be
>> soon. GGC is already on desktop Firefox, and in fact just s
The Web APIs documentation meeting is Friday at 10 AM Pacific Time (see
http://bit.ly/APIdocsMDN for your time zone). Everyone's welcome to
attend; if you're interested in ensuring that all Web APIs are properly
documented, we'd love your input.
We have an agenda, as well as details on how to
On 9/15/14 4:43 PM, Shu-yu Guo wrote:
If you work with JS that contains `let` bindings, you may start encountering
the following two errors:
1. TypeError: redeclaration of variable foo
To fix, rename the variable or remove the extra `let` if you are
assigning to an already-bound
Well, SM's 'let' extension never really let you redeclare let bindings. What
happened was that it was too much work to parse function body-level lets as
actual lets, and so they were parsed as vars, thus allowing "redeclarations".
Keep in mind that vars aren't *really* redeclared. When actual se
If this change proves to be really disruptive to add-on authors, I wonder if we
could just make "let" behave like "var" for add-ons? The JS tokenizer could
just substitute var for let when parsing code from an add-on compartment. (Bug
1030420 will put add-on code in a separate compartment and it
6 matches
Mail list logo
