Hi,
I knew that Firefox can act in UMS mode which means Firefox can act as a gadget.
Since Firefox will not not be only running on cell phone, can firefox acts as a
host?
In the host mode, the system can detect other plugged usb sticks and use it as
a mass storage.
Please provide your feedbac
I've been using an nsIContentPolicy implementation to restrict access to
resources that use my protocol handler. Specifically, I only want to allow
access for requests that come from content under certain circumstances.
To check whether the request comes from privileged code, I've been comparing
Our (somewhat) weekly DOM bindings meetings continue on Monday May
5th at 12:30 PM PDT.
Meeting details:
* Monday, May 5th, 2014, 12:30 PM PDT (3:30 PM EDT/9:30 PM CEST)
* Dial-in Info:
- Vidyo room: Boris Zbarsky
(https://v.mozilla.com/flex.html?roomdirect.html&key=DXThGJaiHtX3)
- In office
On 5/1/2014 9:24 PM, zero wrote:
i fork a process from his parent process using nsIProcess.runAsync()
when i kill the parent process , the child process is untraceable.
is there any method i can use to kill child process after killing parent
process
This is a hard problem in general. O
Hi,
https://ask.mozilla.org/questions/ is now ssl-enabled(old news) and
features persona support(as of today).
Taras
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
The Rendering meeting (https://wiki.mozilla.org/Platform/GFX#Biweekly_meetings)
is about all things Gfx, Image, Layout, and Media.
It takes place every second Monday, alternating between 2:30pm PDT and 5:30pm
PDT.
The next meeting will take place today, Monday, May 5 at 2:30 PM US/Pacific
Pl
On Mon, 5 May 2014, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
>
> drawSystemFocusRing is a rather bad name since most calls to it will
> draw nothing. drawCustomFocusRing is an even worse name since it will
> draw nothing approximately always.
>
> drawFocusIfNeeded replaces drawSystemFocusRing, which is the met
/Summary/: Bring more power of GPU to browsers by exposing OpenGL ES 3
features in WebGL 2.0
/Bug/: 889977
/Link to standard/: https://www.khronos.org/registry/webgl/specs/latest/2.0/
/Platform coverage/: Android, Desktop, Firefox OS
/Estimated or target release/: TBD
/Preference behind which thi
Our trial run of the HTTP cache v2 is done and we will be back to using
the old cache as of tonight's nightly. We found one very important bug
that didn't show up in automated tests, which is great.
Jason
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1006181
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> drawFocusIfNeeded() isn't a particularly good name either, since you're
> not drawing the focus, you're drawing the focus ring.
>
In the old email thread, Jatinder Mann objected to using the term "ring"
since the focus drawn might not look lik
On Tue, 6 May 2014, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> >
> > drawFocusIfNeeded() isn't a particularly good name either, since
> > you're not drawing the focus, you're drawing the focus ring.
>
> In the old email thread, Jatinder Mann objected to usin
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Tue, 6 May 2014, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
>
> > We could probably come up with a slightly better name, but only very
> > slightly better, so at this point I would rather not reopen the
> > discussion. If someone else wants to, that's up to t
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 6 May 2014, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
>>
>> > We could probably come up with a slightly better name, but only very
>> > slightly better, so at this point I would rather not re
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
> FWIW the discussion was public.
> See
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-canvas-api/2014JanMar/0003.html
>
Haha, OK, apology withdrawn :-).
Thanks,
Rob
--
Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni
l
On Tue, 6 May 2014, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> >
> > There hasn't been a discussion at all, so far.
>
> Please don't be too pedantic. There has been a discussion between
> vendors, it just wasn't public. For which I have already apologized.
I'm not trying to be pedantic, nor am I referring to pr
15 matches
Mail list logo