On 04/08/2013 1.42, Neil wrote:
> So nsIDownloadManagerUI is going away too?
The Downloads back-end will not call any method of nsIDownloadManagerUI
anymore, new downloads should be detected using views. Technically, the
interface will still be there for a short time until we refactor the
code tha
Although I agree fully that by far the best way of offering feedback is by
talking to that person directly. I do think we have to face the fact that at
this point in time a significant amount of people find it very hard to speak to
people directly about things. Even when their intention is to pr
On 8/5/13 2:05 AM, Justin Lebar wrote:
Nick, when you made changes to the JS engine's #includes, did you
observe a change in build times?
Just for data, when khuey just reduced the number of includes in
bindings code, that did in fact affect build times.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.
On 05/08/13 14:53, Bas Schouten wrote:
> Although I agree fully that by far the best way of offering feedback
> is by talking to that person directly. I do think we have to face the
> fact that at this point in time a significant amount of people find
> it very hard to speak to people directly abou
Our (ostensibly) weekly DOM bindings meetings continue on Monday August 4th
at 12:30 PM PDT.
Meeting details:
* Monday, August 4, 2013, 12:30 PM PDT (3:30 PM EDT/9:30 PM CEST)
* Conference room 7-N, San Francisco office, 7th floor.
* Dial-in Info:
- Vidyo room: Boris Zbarsky
- In office or soft
On 8/5/13 1:46 AM, Joshua Cranmer 🐧 wrote:
DOMJSProxyHandler.h [2614, #197] includes xpcpublic.h [2645, #188]
includes nsIURI [3295, #121]. DOMJSProxyHandler appears to include
xpcpublic.h solely for IsDOMProxy; xpcpublic.h appears to include nsIURI
because it uses it as an nsCOMPtr in the Compar
Justin Lebar schrieb:
It's a lot better than the page
a) playing audio,
b) spinning your cpu, or
a) pwning you.
True.
Still, if this is a problem (there /are/ a lot of websites which are
just one big flash object), I wonder if we could detect it.
Yes, I worry about those pages that are one
We pushed this back an hour due to the MoCo meeting today.
Our (ostensibly) weekly DOM bindings meetings continue on Monday August 4th
at 1:30 PM PDT.
Meeting details:
* Monday, August 4, 2013, 12:30 PM PDT (3:30 PM EDT/9:30 PM CEST)
* Conference room 7-I, San Francisco office, 7th floor.
* Dial
On 8/5/2013 9:30 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Justin Lebar schrieb:
It's a lot better than the page
a) playing audio,
b) spinning your cpu, or
a) pwning you.
True.
Still, if this is a problem (there /are/ a lot of websites which are
just one big flash object), I wonder if we could detect it.
On 26/07/13 18:29, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> We're planning to implement a prototype of the NavigationController
> interface (see bug 898524). We will try to get feedback from web
> developers on the prototype and will use that feedback to change the spec
> and the implementation and iterate on the A
On Monday, August 5, 2013 10:01:06 AM UTC-7, Mounir Lamouri wrote:
> On 26/07/13 18:29, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
>
> > We're planning to implement a prototype of the NavigationController
>
> > interface (see bug 898524). We will try to get feedback from web
>
> > developers on the prototype and wil
TL;DR: Touch-scroll is broken on some high profile pages which register w3c
touch events - such as google search results. w3c touch will be disabled by
default starting with FX24 until it doesn't break touch scroll (bug 736048). QA
will start testing touch on Firefox-desktop.
w3c touch was ena
The next MemShrink meeting will be brought to you by the Mushroomer game:
http://www.areweflashyet.com/Mushroomer
The wiki page for this meeting is at:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Performance/MemShrink
Agenda:
* Prioritize unprioritized MemShrink bugs.
* Discuss how we measure progress.
* Discus
I don't see a contradiction here. If the person giving feedback is skilled at
doing it, the person receiving it doesn't need to be as skilled in receiving
it. if the person receiving feedback is skilled at receiving, the person
giving it doesn't need to be as skilled at giving it. If both ar
On 08/03/2013 10:28 PM, Mark Hammond wrote:
On 3/08/2013 5:30 AM, Philip Chee wrote:
On 02/08/2013 16:57, t...@adblockplus.org wrote:
The code in question was explicitly running in Firefox Mobile only.
It used messageManager.loadFrameScript() API to inject code into the
content process of new
On 08/02/2013 08:09 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
> 2. It is reasonable to expect that std::whatever works as the C++ standard
> says it should. It isn't reasonable to expect mozilla::Whatever to work
> exactly like std::whatever. And, often, mozilla::Whatever isn't actually
> the same as std::whatever.
16 matches
Mail list logo
