On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 03:09:33 +0200, Justin Dolske
wrote:
Check you system's date + time? If it's living in 1912 or 2112 all the
cert lifetimes will be invalid. (I'm not sure if that's the specific
error one gets in that case, though.)
Thanks for your reply. System date and time is correc
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 04:17:35 +0200, Anthony Jones
wrote:
I've seen this problem when building with Clang 2.9 on Linux but it
seems to work fine with 3.0.
Thanks! Good thing to check. I use clang 3.0:
$ clang -v
Ubuntu clang version 3.0-6ubuntu3 (tags/RELEASE_30/final) (based on LLVM
3.0)
Thank you for your reply.
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 00:20:37 +0200, Brian Smith wrote:
Mihai Sucan wrote:
Any https page I try to load shows:
Peer's certificate has an invalid signature.
Error code: sec_error_bad_signature
I can't even run mochitests that load https pages.
1. Are you usin
On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 12:06:32 AM UTC-5, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 4:07 PM, wrote:
>
> Actually that seems quite easy. For example in FrameLayerBuilder.cpp I can
> add gMaskLayerImageCache to the watch window with no problems, even though
> it's in mozilla::{ano
I have also experienced the same problem on ubuntu/clang - probably the same as
yours. I downloaded a debug build from ftp.mozilla.org in order to test this
with our "official debug builds", which are built with gcc:
Build platform
target
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Build tools
CompilerVers
Hi all,
I'm completely re-implementing localStorage (and sessionStorage)
implementation to be simpler and faster.
One of features of the new code is a way to start async background cache
preload as soon as we know global window is going to load a content page.
The question is: where is a go
On 2012-11-21, at 09:50 , David Dahl wrote:
> I have also experienced the same problem on ubuntu/clang - probably the same
> as yours. I downloaded a debug build from ftp.mozilla.org in order to test
> this with our "official debug builds", which are built with gcc:
There were many fixes since
On 11/21/12 9:50 AM, Honza Bambas wrote:
The question is: where is a good place where nsGlobalWindow already
knows its associated principal to trigger the preload?
Outer window, or inner window?
Also, do you need to know the exact principal, or just "not system"?
-Boris
_
I am registering a listener for "abort" event in XHR
xhr.addEventListener("abort", onAbort, false);
but it isn't executed in the following case:
var request = new XMLHttpRequest();
request.open("POST", "issue2462.php", true);
request.send(null);
request.abort();
nsIEventListene
On 11/21/12 11:31 AM, Jan Honza Odvarko wrote:
Am I doing something wrong?
When is the addEventListener call made?
Apart from that, nothing obviously wrong. A testcase that shows the
problem would be helpful.
-Boris
___
dev-platform mailing list
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 16:54:35 +0200, Rafael Ávila de Espíndola
wrote:
On 2012-11-21, at 09:50 , David Dahl wrote:
I have also experienced the same problem on ubuntu/clang - probably the
same as yours. I downloaded a debug build from ftp.mozilla.org in order
to test this with our "official
On 11/21/2012 4:06 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 11/21/12 9:50 AM, Honza Bambas wrote:
The question is: where is a good place where nsGlobalWindow already
knows its associated principal to trigger the preload?
Outer window, or inner window?
The same window localStorage getter is called on, so
On 11/21/12 1:39 PM, Honza Bambas wrote:
On 11/21/2012 4:06 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 11/21/12 9:50 AM, Honza Bambas wrote:
The question is: where is a good place where nsGlobalWindow already
knows its associated principal to trigger the preload?
Outer window, or inner window?
The same wi
Please share your Snappy status on the etherpad by EOD Thursday.
https://etherpad.mozilla.org/snappy
Lawrence
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
On 8/1/2011 6:55 AM, Panos Astithas wrote:
We're not quite there yet, but as soon as we have a functional
debugger for content, a debugger for chrome will soon follow.
Panos
What's the status of the chrome debugger?
___
dev-platform mailing list
de
On 22/11/2012 2:42 p.m., al...@yahoo.com wrote:
What's the status of the chrome debugger?
Pretty good - it has some rough(/sharp) edges, but I've found it to be
usable for chrome work. See:
https://campd.wordpress.com/2012/11/12/firefox-and-addon-developers-should-set-devtools-chrome-enabled/
16 matches
Mail list logo
