Re: Increase in mozilla-inbound bustage due to people not using Try

2012-08-17 Thread Mark Hammond
On 16/08/2012 4:10 PM, Mike Hommey wrote: ... > Something I noticed recently is that we spend more than 5 minutes (!) during windows clobber builds to do the clobber (rm -rf). All try builds are clobbers. IME, "rd /s/q" is usually much faster than "rm -rf" - using "cmd /c rd /s/q obj-xxx" migh

Compiling Binary XPCOM Plugin with Gecko 15

2012-08-17 Thread orangespidermaster
I maintain a binary XPCOM component for Firefox. While compiling it with the Gecko SDK 15 I get the following error: xpcomglue_s_nomozalloc.lib(nsStringAPI.obj) : error LNK2038: mismatch detected for '_ITERATOR_DEBUG_LEVEL': value '0' doesn't match value '2' in main.obj I compile with Visual St

Re: Access Windows system variable from chrome JavaScript

2012-08-17 Thread Neil
Malintha Adikari wrote: I want to access system variable in Windows OS from my firebug extension. Can I do that ? Is it possible to access OS system variables inside the chrome JavaScript ? Did you mean environment variable? In that case use https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/XPCOM_I

Re: Proposed policy change: reusability of tests by other browsers

2012-08-17 Thread Aryeh Gregor
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > 1. Is the current testharness.js API the documentation at the beginning of > ? If that is the case, the > API looks a lot heavier weight than the default mochitest API we use. Not in practice.

Re: WheelEvent of DOM Level 3 Events now landed

2012-08-17 Thread Masayuki Nakano
On 2012/08/13 18:19, Masayuki Nakano wrote: On 2012/08/13 17:32, Neil wrote: Masayuki Nakano wrote: On 2012/08/13 4:57, Neil wrote: it seems as if you can't make the wheel scroll more slowly any more? Currently, yes. The reason for not supporting slower scrolling isn't technical reason. It

Re: Proposed policy change: reusability of tests by other browsers

2012-08-17 Thread James Graham
On 08/17/2012 01:22 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote: If there's one big problem with shared tests, it's that we have to change the way we annotate expected failures. Currently we just go in and change ok() to todo() or whatever in the source code of the test, but of course that doesn't work for shared t

Re: Compiling Binary XPCOM Plugin with Gecko 15

2012-08-17 Thread Benjamin Smedberg
On 8/17/2012 3:14 AM, orangespidermas...@googlemail.com wrote: I maintain a binary XPCOM component for Firefox. While compiling it with the Gecko SDK 15 I get the following error: xpcomglue_s_nomozalloc.lib(nsStringAPI.obj) : error LNK2038: mismatch detected for '_ITERATOR_DEBUG_LEVEL': value '

Re: STR Needed Keyword?

2012-08-17 Thread Ralph Giles
On 12-08-16 6:01 PM, Anthony Hughes wrote: > (CCing dev-quality to reach a broader audience -- please direct responses to > dev-platform) > > It has come to my attention that we lack a keyword in Bugzilla for when > steps-to-reproduce are needed (a very common request). However, we do have > ke

LinuxGL widget backend for Mozilla

2012-08-17 Thread romaxa
Hi, Recently I have been working on B2G port to mobile Linux which would be widget toolkit-independent (qt/gtk/cocoa/etc). The goal is to make it easy to build Mozilla/Gecko on boards like BeagleBoard (ubuntu-arm), PandaBoard (ubuntu-arm), Tegra (L4T), Raspberry Pi (debian-arm). Quite often s

LinuxGL widget backend for Mozilla

2012-08-17 Thread romaxa
Hi, Recently I have been working on B2G port to mobile Linux which would be widget toolkit-independent (qt/gtk/cocoa/etc). The goal is to make it easy to build Mozilla/Gecko on boards like BeagleBoard (ubuntu-arm), PandaBoard (ubuntu-arm), Tegra (L4T), Raspberry Pi (debian-arm). Quite often s

Gfx meeting, Monday 2:30 PM Pacific

2012-08-17 Thread Joe Drew
Our graphics meeting will, as usual, be on Monday, 20 August at 14:30 PDT. Come and say goodbye to Ali Juma, whose last day at Moco is on Monday. :( Here is a tool that can convert this to another timezone: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converted.html?iso=20120820T1430&p1=224&p2=250&p4=

Re: Proposed policy change: reusability of tests by other browsers

2012-08-17 Thread Justin Dolske
On 8/16/12 3:01 PM, Kyle Huey wrote: The basic idea here sounds worthy, but one concern is that our own tests are often unreliable in our own browser -- and I'd expect that to only get worse as other browsers and their tests enter the picture. That's not really true. Most of our mochitests an

Re: Proposed policy change: reusability of tests by other browsers

2012-08-17 Thread Gavin Sharp
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Justin Dolske wrote: > I'm talking about the problem of having a large set of tests with a small > percentage that fail intermittently, which is what we have today in m-c. What percentage of the intermittently-failing tests are tests for web features vs. tests for