On 1/18/19 11:20 AM, Kartikaya Gupta wrote:
> Any update here? Is there a bug on file for making bootstrap install a
> usable nasm?
I just made one:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1521186
It has two deps, on making the actual toolchain scripts.
_
Any update here? Is there a bug on file for making bootstrap install a
usable nasm?
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 3:28 PM Andi-Bogdan Postelnicu wrote:
>
> I can confirm that we are having the same problem on Debian stretch and
> before manually building nasm we had to disable av1 in order to be able
On 12/21/18 3:09 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 04:21:03PM -0500, Kartikaya Gupta wrote:
>> I would certainly prefer this, and having this work smoothly would
>> also be good for new contributors. Having to build and install extra
>> packages is always a hassle.
>
> It's a hassle
I can confirm that we are having the same problem on Debian stretch and before
manually building nasm we had to disable av1 in order to be able to move
further with the static analysis builds for coverity.
> On 28 Dec 2018, at 22:19, Botond Ballo wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 4:21 PM Kar
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 4:21 PM Kartikaya Gupta wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 4:10 PM Thomas Daede wrote:
> > There is a toolchain build for nasm for windows:
> > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1511224
> >
> > If getting a newer nasm version is inconvenient for a majority of li
On 12/21/18 3:09 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 04:21:03PM -0500, Kartikaya Gupta wrote:
>> I would certainly prefer this, and having this work smoothly would
>> also be good for new contributors. Having to build and install extra
>> packages is always a hassle.
>
> It's a hassle
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 04:21:03PM -0500, Kartikaya Gupta wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 4:10 PM Thomas Daede wrote:
> > There is a toolchain build for nasm for windows:
> > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1511224
> >
> > If getting a newer nasm version is inconvenient for a majorit
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 4:10 PM Thomas Daede wrote:
> There is a toolchain build for nasm for windows:
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1511224
>
> If getting a newer nasm version is inconvenient for a majority of linux
> users, the toolchain build could be used to produce nasm binar
On 12/21/18 8:08 AM, Kartikaya Gupta wrote:
> Looks like the default nasm in the Ubuntu 16.04 repositories is 2.11.
> Are there plans to make `./mach bootstrap` find a 2.13 version from
> somewhere, instead of just installing via `apt-get` and assuming it's
> the right version?
There is a toolchai
Looks like the default nasm in the Ubuntu 16.04 repositories is 2.11.
Are there plans to make `./mach bootstrap` find a 2.13 version from
somewhere, instead of just installing via `apt-get` and assuming it's
the right version?
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 12:00 AM Thomas Daede wrote:
>
> On 12/20/18
On 12/20/18 8:17 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> The OP said >= 2.10. But you appear to have that.
At the time of writing it was, but we now need 2.13. The configure
script doesn't check for that either, I will make a note of it in the
bug to fix this detection.
_
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018, at 3:17 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> The OP said >= 2.10. But you appear to have that.
Oh, missed that.
I just tried building some other versions of nasm from source (since 2.11 is
the latest packaged in my distribution) and 2.13 was the earliest that I could
build with.
_
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 3:01 PM Cameron McCormack wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018, at 11:05 AM, Thomas Daede wrote:
> > nasm is now required for building on Linux.
>
> Is there a minimum version required? I am getting errors like this
> building:
>
The OP said >= 2.10. But you appear to have tha
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018, at 11:05 AM, Thomas Daede wrote:
> nasm is now required for building on Linux.
Is there a minimum version required? I am getting errors like this building:
/z/moz/g/third_party/dav1d/src/x86/ipred_ssse3.asm:42: error: operand 1:
expression is not simple or relocatable
$ n
nasm is now required for building on Linux.
A configure check was missed, so if you are missing nasm, you will see
this error:
make[4]: *** No rule to make target '../../media/libdav1d/asm/config.o',
needed by 'libxul.so'. Stop.
This bug tracks adding the configure check:
https://bugzilla.mozill
nasm is now preferred over yasm if it's detected at configure time.
Note that compilation will currently fail if a very old nasm is
installed. If this happens, either update nasm (such as via mach
bootstrap), or remove it, and then rerun mach configure.
Thomas
On 10/26/18 12:57 PM, Thomas Daede
Firefox is switching its AV1 implementation to dav1d, a new,
multithreaded AV1 decoder. dav1d requires nasm >= 2.10, which means that
it will become a build-time dependency of Firefox.
mach bootstrap will automatically install nasm, and it is also available
in most package managers. Building witho
17 matches
Mail list logo
