W3C recently published the following proposed recommendation (the
stage before W3C's final stage, Recommendation):
http://www.w3.org/TR/cors/
Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS)
There's a call for review to W3C member companies (of which Mozilla
is one) open until January 14.
If there are c
On 11/27/13 2:03 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
I can't figure out what, if anything, this discussion implies about
the ballot on the Proposed Recommendations.
I'm not sure.
Basically, I think we're in a sucky situation here:
1) These are specs that we'll need to implement.
2) We were not involv
I can't figure out what, if anything, this discussion implies about
the ballot on the Proposed Recommendations. At this point I'm
inclined not to respond to the vote.
-David
--
đť„ž L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ đť„‚
𝄢 Mozilla https://www.moz
On 11/27/13 11:51 AM, Rob Campbell wrote:
IMO, this is implementation detail for describing the data structures used by a
timeline “entry”
There are specs that expose these entries too, so this is not
implementation detail but something we'll need to end up implementing
when Facebook and com
Zbarsky" , "Axel Kratel" ,
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 8:51:32 AM
Subject: Re: W3C Proposed Recommendations: Performance Timeline, User Timing,
JSON-LD
I’ve been aware of these proposals. Honestly, there’s not a lot of meat in the
performance timeli
I’ve been aware of these proposals. Honestly, there’s not a lot of meat in the
performance timeline proposal and one of the editors doesn’t appear to be
actively involved anymore.
IMO, this is implementation detail for describing the data structures used by a
timeline “entry”. I’m not sure how
I don't know how well (or if at all) the current push for performance
devtools is coordinated with these proposals, but it would certainly be
worth looking into that.
CCing Axel Kratel.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:31 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 11/25/13 7:07 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
>
>>
On 11/25/13 7:07 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
http://www.w3.org/TR/performance-timeline/
Performance Timeline
http://www.w3.org/TR/user-timing/
User Timing
Have we had anyone at all review these specs? My past experience with
that working group and set of editors doesn't make me san
W3C recently published the following proposed recommendations (the
stage before W3C's final stage, Recommendation):
http://www.w3.org/TR/performance-timeline/
Performance Timeline
http://www.w3.org/TR/user-timing/
User Timing
http://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/
JSON-LD 1.0: A JSON-based Se
9 matches
Mail list logo
