Adam Roach writes:
> My understanding is that the autolander is available only to
> developers with Level 3 access, right? Given that this is the same
> group of people who can do a manual check-in, I don't see why we would
> make autolanding have to clear a higher bar than manual landing.
We co
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Adam Roach wrote:
> On 1/22/16 06:12, Daniel Minor wrote:
>
>> Another difference is that sheriffs require a try run before they will
>> land
>> a patch flagged "checkin-needed." In Bug 1239281 we're proposing to
>> implement this requirement for autolanding.
>>
>
On 1/22/16 06:12, Daniel Minor wrote:
Another difference is that sheriffs require a try run before they will land
a patch flagged "checkin-needed." In Bug 1239281 we're proposing to
implement this requirement for autolanding.
I'm always wary of using tools to enforce policy, since you frequentl
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 8:00 AM, Andreas Tolfsen wrote:
> Overall I think this idea makes sense. Is it your intention that the
> try run should be 100% complete, or just that one exists and is
> associated with the review? In some cases I find myself invoking
> Autoland when I feel reasonably c
Overall I think this idea makes sense. Is it your intention that the
try run should be 100% complete, or just that one exists and is
associated with the review? In some cases I find myself invoking
Autoland when I feel reasonably confident about the results.
On 22 January 2016 at 12:12, Daniel M
One of our goals for autoland is to replace the "checkin-needed" process
that is currently done manually by the sheriffs. We still have a few bugs
to fix before this is ready, for instance, approval for autolanding is not
carried forward for some users if they amend their patch.
Another difference
6 matches
Mail list logo
