Re: PGO: another test + PGO topcrashes

2012-11-02 Thread Ted Mielczarek
On 11/1/2012 9:19 PM, Dave Mandelin wrote: > (a) How about building Windows with a newer version of MSVC, say 2012? (What > version are we using now, anyway? The build instructions page says 2010 is > official, but a tbpl log showed Visual Studio 9.0 on the path.) Maybe they > have fixed bugs i

Re: PGO: another test + PGO topcrashes

2012-11-01 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
On 2012-11-01 9:19 PM, Dave Mandelin wrote: (a) How about building Windows with a newer version of MSVC, say 2012? (What version are we using now, anyway? The build instructions page says 2010 is official, but a tbpl log showed Visual Studio 9.0 on the path.) Maybe they have fixed bugs in PG

Re: PGO: another test + PGO topcrashes

2012-11-01 Thread Robert O'Callahan
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Dave Mandelin wrote: > (b) Failing that, how about not fixing PGO bugs unless they are > reproducible, on a trial basis? If my lifecycle theory is correct, then the > total crash rate would stay roughly constant. And I assume that if the > crash rate doesn't actua