On Wednesday, 6 June 2018 19:58:43 UTC-4, Xidorn Quan wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018, at 12:57 AM, Mark Côté wrote:
> > Phabricator is a suite of applications, but we are primarily using the
> > code-review tool, called Differential, which will be taking the place of
> > MozReview and Splinter. Bu
On 06/06/2018 15:57, Mark Côté wrote:
Similarly, there are two other features which are not part of initial launch
but will follow in subsequent releases:
* Stacked revisions. If you have a stack of revisions, that is, two or more
revisions with parent-child relationships, Lando cannot land th
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018, at 12:57 AM, Mark Côté wrote:
> Phabricator is a suite of applications, but we are primarily using the
> code-review tool, called Differential, which will be taking the place of
> MozReview and Splinter. Bug tracking will continue to be done with
> Bugzilla, which is integra
On Wednesday, 6 June 2018 15:18:43 UTC-4, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey wrote:
> On 6/6/18 3:03 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> > On 6/6/18 2:52 PM, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey wrote:
> > Mozreview will show me the equivalent of "diff -r B -r P1", "diff -r P1
> > -r P2" and "diff -r P2 -r P3". If there are then edits to P
On 6/6/18 3:03 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 6/6/18 2:52 PM, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey wrote:
Mozreview will show me the equivalent of "diff -r B -r P1", "diff -r P1
-r P2" and "diff -r P2 -r P3". If there are then edits to P1 to produce
Q1, the diff revision slider will let me choose between "diff -r B
On 6/6/18 2:52 PM, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey wrote:
Sorry, I shouldn't have assumed. FWIW mozReview handles all this
exceedingly well today IMHO, using the "Diff Revision" slider, even for
the whole patch set.
Sort of. As long as people don't mess up their mozreview ids
One example of "better" w
On 6/6/18 1:49 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 6/6/18 1:41 PM, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey wrote:
I think bz is asking about mozReview's ability to handle multiple
commits in a single review (and handle updates in both dimensions).
This fits the hg evolve model well, and was AFAIK a unique workflow of
mozRe
This is really great news, I'm really excited to start using it!
Automated landings from code review is such a game changer for
productivity and security.
Congrats to everyone involved.
Cheers,
Chris
On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 at 11:01, Mark Côté wrote:
>
> The Engineering Workflow team is happy to an
On 6/6/18 1:49 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
Basically, I want some equivalent to "hg bzexport" or something better
One example of "better" would be being able to see "the diff with the
first N patches applied" without having to do painstaking work. This is
something the "attach patches to Bugzil
On 6/6/18 1:41 PM, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey wrote:
I think bz is asking about mozReview's ability to handle multiple
commits in a single review (and handle updates in both dimensions). This
fits the hg evolve model well, and was AFAIK a unique workflow of
mozReview.
This isn't actually what I was as
On 6/6/18 11:48 AM, Mark Côté wrote:
On Wednesday, 6 June 2018 11:18:43 UTC-4, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
* Stacked revisions. If you have a stack of revisions, that is, two or more
revisions with parent-child relationships, Lando cannot land them all at once.
Does Differential support this case n
On 6/6/18 12:20 PM, Mark Côté wrote:
Another good question. :) Given that it is also a rich web app, I'm tempted to say
"not awesome", but I'll have to try it out. If it is indeed not awesome, we
can try to work with upstream to improve the situation.
OK. To be clear, the offline support of
On Wednesday, 6 June 2018 12:08:49 UTC-4, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 6/6/18 11:48 AM, Mark Côté wrote:
> > Good question. Probably, as it has different uses, but it shouldn't be
> > used to work around Phabricator. :)
>
> A related question: How is Phabricator's offline support? This was a
> c
On 6/6/18 11:48 AM, Mark Côté wrote:
Good question. Probably, as it has different uses, but it shouldn't be used to
work around Phabricator. :)
A related question: How is Phabricator's offline support? This was a
continuous pain point for me with mozreview: it was basically impossible
to m
On Wednesday, 6 June 2018 11:18:43 UTC-4, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 6/6/18 10:57 AM, Mark Côté wrote:
> > An upcoming post will outline the plans for the deprecation, archival, and
> > decommission of MozReview, with Splinter to follow.
>
> Just a quick question: will Bugzilla's "edit attachment
On 6/6/18 10:57 AM, Mark Côté wrote:
An upcoming post will outline the plans for the deprecation, archival, and
decommission of MozReview, with Splinter to follow.
Just a quick question: will Bugzilla's "edit attachment as comment"
functionality remain?
* Stacked revisions. If you have a s
16 matches
Mail list logo