Re: PSA: New C++11 features made available by dropping support for gcc-4.6 in Gecko 38

On 2015-05-12 7:57 PM, Karl Tomlinson wrote: Ehsan Akhgari writes: On Monday, May 11, 2015, Xidorn Quan wrote: On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Ehsan Akhgari > wrote: On 2015-04-30 7:57 AM, Xidorn Quan wrote: I guess we probably should forbid using any expression with side effect for me

Re: PSA: New C++11 features made available by dropping support for gcc-4.6 in Gecko 38

Ehsan Akhgari writes: > On Monday, May 11, 2015, Xidorn Quan wrote: > >> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Ehsan Akhgari > > wrote: >> >>> On 2015-04-30 7:57 AM, Xidorn Quan wrote: I guess we probably should forbid using any expression with side effect for member initializers.

Re: PSA: New C++11 features made available by dropping support for gcc-4.6 in Gecko 38

On Monday, May 11, 2015, Xidorn Quan wrote: > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Ehsan Akhgari > wrote: > >> On 2015-04-30 7:57 AM, Xidorn Quan wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Robert O'Callahan < >>> rob...@ocallahan.org >>> > >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 4:14 AM, >>

Re: PSA: New C++11 features made available by dropping support for gcc-4.6 in Gecko 38

On 5/11/2015 2:29 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: On 2015-04-30 7:57 AM, Xidorn Quan wrote: On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 4:14 AM, wrote: * member initializers Should we have any rules around these, or should we use them indiscriminately? I

Re: PSA: New C++11 features made available by dropping support for gcc-4.6 in Gecko 38

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > On 2015-04-30 7:57 AM, Xidorn Quan wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Robert O'Callahan > > >> wrote: >> >> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 4:14 AM, wrote: >>> >>> * member initializers >>> Should we have any rules around the

Re: PSA: New C++11 features made available by dropping support for gcc-4.6 in Gecko 38

On 2015-04-30 7:57 AM, Xidorn Quan wrote: On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 4:14 AM, wrote: * member initializers Should we have any rules around these, or should we use them indiscriminately? I wonder particularly about initializers which

Re: PSA: New C++11 features made available by dropping support for gcc-4.6 in Gecko 38

On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 4:14 AM, wrote: > > > * member initializers > > > > Should we have any rules around these, or should we use them > indiscriminately? I wonder particularly about initializers which are > complicated expressions.

Re: PSA: New C++11 features made available by dropping support for gcc-4.6 in Gecko 38

On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 4:14 AM, wrote: > * member initializers > Should we have any rules around these, or should we use them indiscriminately? I wonder particularly about initializers which are complicated expressions. Rob -- oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonog

Re: PSA: New C++11 features made available by dropping support for gcc-4.6 in Gecko 38

On Friday, March 20, 2015 at 4:14:47 PM UTC+1, bo...@mozilla.com wrote: > I was asked to repost this in a new thread in case it got lost ... > > I have now updated the two MDN pages (that I know of) to reflect that gcc-4.7 > or later is now required. > >

Re: PSA: New C++11 features made available by dropping support for gcc-4.6 in Gecko 38

On 2015-03-20 11:14 AM, bo...@mozilla.com wrote: I was asked to repost this in a new thread in case it got lost ... I have now updated the two MDN pages (that I know of) to reflect that gcc-4.7 or later is now required.

PSA: New C++11 features made available by dropping support for gcc-4.6 in Gecko 38

I was asked to repost this in a new thread in case it got lost ... I have now updated the two MDN pages (that I know of) to reflect that gcc-4.7 or later is now required.