Add-ons that use those APIs can pass review, yes. They would also need
to be signed, unless they're using one of the Firefox versions that can
disable signing.
Jorge
On 8/29/15 10:50 AM, Tim Guan-tin Chien wrote:
> Will either js-ctypes or child process-calling add-on passes AMO
> review? With si
Will either js-ctypes or child process-calling add-on passes AMO
review? With signing requirement those add-ons would not be allow to
run in Firefox without signing from AMO at all right?
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:42 PM, Benjamin Smedberg
wrote:
>
>
> On 8/28/2015 10:25 AM, Tony wrote:
>>
>> Our
While this sounds like a good solution to this specific use case, and
while I agree that js-ctypes is horribly fragile, I'm not certain that
this solution can be generalized to AMO-released add-ons that need
access to OS-specific features, since we don't really like add-ons that
ship native code.
On 8/28/2015 10:25 AM, Tony wrote:
Our product makes use of a 3rd party medical device that requires a C library
for usage. We created a NPAPI plugin that wraps this C library so we can
access the device from JavaScript.
Here's where the lawyers get involved...
The medical device, **includ
On 2015-08-28 10:25 AM, Tony wrote:
Our product makes use of a 3rd party medical device that requires a C library
for usage. We created a NPAPI plugin that wraps this C library so we can
access the device from JavaScript.
Have you considered creating an extension that calls into the C librar
Our product makes use of a 3rd party medical device that requires a C library
for usage. We created a NPAPI plugin that wraps this C library so we can
access the device from JavaScript.
Here's where the lawyers get involved...
The medical device, **including** the software included with the de
6 matches
Mail list logo
