Re: Intent to unship: ::-moz-math-anonymous.

2018-02-21 Thread Emilio Cobos Álvarez
On 02/21/2018 09:13 PM, Frédéric Wang wrote: On 21/02/2018 19:07, Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote: On 02/21/2018 07:02 PM, Tantek Çelik wrote: SGTM. I did not find any references on MDN, so nothing to update there AFAIK. However with a broader web search I found https://gist.github.com/yields/6648

Re: Intent to unship: ::-moz-math-anonymous.

2018-02-21 Thread Frédéric Wang
On 21/02/2018 19:07, Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote: > > On 02/21/2018 07:02 PM, Tantek Çelik wrote: >> SGTM. I did not find any references on MDN, so nothing to update there >> AFAIK. >> >> However with a broader web search I found >> https://gist.github.com/yields/6648240 >> >> Is ::-moz-math-anonym

Re: Intent to unship: ::-moz-math-anonymous.

2018-02-21 Thread Emilio Cobos Álvarez
On 02/21/2018 07:02 PM, Tantek Çelik wrote: SGTM. I did not find any references on MDN, so nothing to update there AFAIK. However with a broader web search I found https://gist.github.com/yields/6648240 Is ::-moz-math-anonymous special? (last of its kind?) Or would the same reasoning apply to

Re: Intent to unship: ::-moz-math-anonymous.

2018-02-21 Thread Tantek Çelik
SGTM. I did not find any references on MDN, so nothing to update there AFAIK. However with a broader web search I found https://gist.github.com/yields/6648240 Is ::-moz-math-anonymous special? (last of its kind?) Or would the same reasoning apply to removing access to ::-moz-math-stretchy or any

Intent to unship: ::-moz-math-anonymous.

2018-02-21 Thread Emilio Cobos Álvarez
Hi, In bug 1439837 I intend to remove access to the ::-moz-math-anonymous pseudo-element. This is a Gecko-only pseudo-element that is there since the initial Gecko export, and is only used to get a style inheriting from another one for some MathML characters, so it has no good reason to be e