On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 3:25 AM violet wrote:
> Preference behind which this will be implemented:
> layout.css.overflow-logical.enabled
>
> Enabled by default.
>
Enabled by default sounds fine to me in this case.
Thanks for doing this,
Sean
___
dev-pl
On 6/14/19 6:23 AM, violet wrote:
Preference behind which this will be implemented:
layout.css.overflow-logical.enabled
Thank you.
-Boris
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Preference behind which this will be implemented:
layout.css.overflow-logical.enabled
Enabled by default.
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
> It's probably a good idea to have a pref controlling whether these get
parsed, so we can disable if needed if there's an issue, given that no
one has shipped these yet in a final release.
Ok, I'll add a flag for this.
> Are these just logical versions of the existing overflow-x and
overflow-y p
> Chrome has shipped these properties in latest Canary, commit:
> https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/985a82ce4c869aca8e33dc213293a37b2764d69c
To clarify, Chrome has just implemented a few days ago, it's not "shipped" yet.
The status can be found here:
https://chromium.googlesource.
On 6/13/19 4:15 AM, violet wrote:
Preference behind which this will be implemented: none.
It's probably a good idea to have a pref controlling whether these get
parsed, so we can disable if needed if there's an issue, given that no
one has shipped these yet in a final release. Or are there t
Summary: implement overflow-block and overflow-inline CSS properties
Bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1470695
Link to standard: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-overflow-3/#logical
Platform coverage: all.
Estimated or target release: 69
Preference behind which this will be impleme
7 matches
Mail list logo