Re: Intent to deploy: plugin timeout A/B test experiment, bug 1018200

2014-08-04 Thread Chad Weiner
> Chad, I'm looking for your approval to use 5% of the beta population for this > experiment. Apologies for any delay my PTO caused. This is enthusiastically approved. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozil

Re: Intent to deploy: plugin timeout A/B test experiment, bug 1018200

2014-07-22 Thread Lawrence Mandel
I missed this earlier. Lacking any major concerns (Jet did express one), I approve the deployment of this experiment on Beta 32 on behalf of release management. Lawrence - Original Message - > This is an official notice of intent to deploy the experiment in bug > 1018200 to the beta cha

Re: Intent to deploy: plugin timeout A/B test experiment, bug 1018200

2014-07-16 Thread Benjamin Smedberg
On 7/16/2014 3:35 PM, Jet Villegas wrote: after a user isn't using it any more How good are we at determining "any more?" We start counting when the last instance for that plugin is destroyed (NPP_Destroy). --BDS ___ dev-platform mailing list de

Re: Intent to deploy: plugin timeout A/B test experiment, bug 1018200

2014-07-16 Thread Jet Villegas
> after a user isn't using it any more How good are we at determining "any more?" Flash is used in all sorts of crazy ways, and guessing wrong can be more harmful than unloading too soon/late. --Jet ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozi

Intent to deploy: plugin timeout A/B test experiment, bug 1018200

2014-07-16 Thread Benjamin Smedberg
This is an official notice of intent to deploy the experiment in bug 1018200 to the beta channel. The experiment is an A/B test to determine the optimal value of the dom.ipc.plugins.unloadTimeoutSecs on the FF32 beta. This setting determines primarily how long we wait to unload Flash and other