\o/
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> Yes!
>
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Kyle Machulis
> wrote:
> > Summary: We've already got the performance resource timing API
> implemented (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=822480), but
> never got around to implemen
Yup, this is all Eli's fault. :)
- Original Message -
> From: "Ehsan Akhgari"
> To: "Kyle Machulis" , dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org,
> dev-web...@lists.mozilla.org, "Eli Perelman"
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 5:57:44 PM
>
Nice!
Eli was looking into this recently as well, not sure if you guys have
talked about this, if not, you should. :-)
On 2014-12-11 8:11 PM, Kyle Machulis wrote:
Summary: We've already got the performance resource timing API implemented
(https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=822480)
ulis"
>> Cc: "dev-platform" , "dev-webapi"
>>
>> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 5:15:22 PM
>> Subject: Re: Intent to Implement: User Timing API
>
>> Yes!
>
>> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Kyle Machulis wrote:
>&
Small correction, the preference should be dom.enable_user_timing, not
dom.enable_performance
- Original Message -
> From: "Jonas Sicking"
> To: "Kyle Machulis"
> Cc: "dev-platform" , "dev-webapi"
>
> Sent: Thursday, December
Yes!
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Kyle Machulis wrote:
> Summary: We've already got the performance resource timing API implemented
> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=822480), but never got around
> to implementing the user timing API. This would allow users to set unique
> ma
Summary: We've already got the performance resource timing API implemented
(https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=822480), but never got around to
implementing the user timing API. This would allow users to set unique marks
for profiling events in their own code, and most of the objects a
7 matches
Mail list logo