Re: E10S performance & stability metrics (January 2016 edition)

2016-01-19 Thread Vladan D
> Unfortunately, the BHR Telemetry data from both Aurora 43 & Beta 44 > experiments suggests that e10s is jankier than non-e10s. This holds true > for profiles with & without extensions. > > However, we have identified bugs causing inaccuracies in BHR reporting and > we are working to imporve BHR a

E10S performance & stability metrics (January 2016 edition)

2016-01-18 Thread Vladan Djeric
This is a high-level overview of the Perf team's efforts so far to certify e10s performance & stability -- these metrics will have to be as good as those of single-process Firefox before e10s can be released as the default configuration on the Release channel. This post is addressed to the general