Harald (on CC) is working on it here:
https://github.com/mozilla/platatus
On Oct 29, 2015 6:38 PM, "Tom Schuster" wrote:
> Seems like this kind of died. I still would like to see this happening. Is
> this on somebody's agenda?
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Tom Schuster wrote:
>
> > I see
Seems like this kind of died. I still would like to see this happening. Is
this on somebody's agenda?
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Tom Schuster wrote:
> I see 3 (now 4) old pull requests that are unmerged.
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Anthony Ricaud wrote:
>
>> On 16/07/15 21:26, An
I see 3 (now 4) old pull requests that are unmerged.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Anthony Ricaud wrote:
> On 16/07/15 21:26, Anthony Ricaud wrote:
>
>> Potch and I are working on a website to present Mozilla's point of view
>> on various web platform features. Other browsers have similar web
On 16/07/15 21:26, Anthony Ricaud wrote:
Potch and I are working on a website to present Mozilla's point of view
on various web platform features. Other browsers have similar websites
[1] [2] [3]. This project has been in lingo for a while so, to get it
out the door, we're going to focus on one i
This is awesome. When you have a final place for the data, I'll look at pulling
this into status.modern.ie so Firefox data is always up to date.
https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/Status/issues/246
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozill
On 17/07/15 16:46, James Graham wrote:
On 17/07/15 04:21, Eric Shepherd wrote:
Agreed. This is about how we feel about a spec, its content, and the
design of its API, not about if or when we will get around to
implementing it. That's also something worth capturing, but they're
not the same data
On 17/07/15 04:21, Eric Shepherd wrote:
Agreed. This is about how we feel about a spec, its content, and the
design of its API, not about if or when we will get around to
implementing it. That's also something worth capturing, but they're
not the same data points at all.
I think it's the exact
On 16/07/15 21:26, Anthony Ricaud wrote:
Potch and I are working on a website to present Mozilla's point of view
on various web platform features. Other browsers have similar websites
[1] [2] [3]. This project has been in lingo for a while so, to get it
out the door, we're going to focus on one i
Ehsan Akhgari schrieb:
I think we need to have a way to signal that we are not going to
implement a specific feature in addition to those categories (without
delving into the specific example here, but yes this is one of those
features.) That sends a useful signal to other browser vendors and we
Anthony,
Very very cool idea.
About the features encyclopedia:
Le 17 juil. 2015 à 04:26, Anthony Ricaud a écrit :
> Other browsers have similar websites [2]
> [2] https://status.modern.ie
fwiw, The IE team has put their project on github. [4]
But even better they already have a format for desc
Agreed. This is about how we feel about a spec, its content, and the design of
its API, not about if or when we will get around to implementing it. That's
also something worth capturing, but they're not the same data points at all.
Eric Shepherd
Sr. Technical Writer
Mozilla
Blog: http://www.bits
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Ehsan Akhgari
wrote:
> On 2015-07-16 9:21 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Benjamin Kelly
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> FWIW, I've sent an intent to implement for the Streams API, but I won't
>>> be
>>> able to actually start work until
On 2015-07-16 9:21 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Benjamin Kelly wrote:
FWIW, I've sent an intent to implement for the Streams API, but I won't be
able to actually start work until Q4. I just listed that as "favorable"
for now. Not sure if we need a clearer "we i
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Benjamin Kelly wrote:
>
>
> FWIW, I've sent an intent to implement for the Streams API, but I won't be
> able to actually start work until Q4. I just listed that as "favorable"
> for now. Not sure if we need a clearer "we intend to implement this but
> just haven
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Anthony Ricaud wrote:
> Regarding "in progress|favorable|not favorable|no opinion", I think
>> that we don't need to be opinionated about features we aren't
>> implementing unless we have a firm commitment not to implement the
>> feature. Here I'm thinking variou
On 16/07/15 21:51, Martin Thomson wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Anthony Ricaud wrote:
In order to get accurate data and update it regularly, we need your help.
Please go to the following etherpad and insert any information that can help
us:
https://etherpad.mozilla.org/gecko-web-plat
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Anthony Ricaud wrote:
> In order to get accurate data and update it regularly, we need your help.
> Please go to the following etherpad and insert any information that can help
> us:
> https://etherpad.mozilla.org/gecko-web-platform-dashboard
That's a fairly clum
On 2015-07-16 3:26 PM, Anthony Ricaud wrote:
Potch and I are working on a website to present Mozilla's point of view
on various web platform features. Other browsers have similar websites
[1] [2] [3]. This project has been in lingo for a while so, to get it
out the door, we're going to focus on o
Potch and I are working on a website to present Mozilla's point of view
on various web platform features. Other browsers have similar websites
[1] [2] [3]. This project has been in lingo for a while so, to get it
out the door, we're going to focus on one information: what is Mozilla's
opinion o
19 matches
Mail list logo
