Re: Changed font size interpretation

2012-12-23 Thread Allan
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 03:49:26 UTC, Dave Yeo wrote: > Allan wrote: > > For a long time, I never understood how that worked for you. > > I have same problem here, that just about all websites uses too small fonts. > > When I tried that setting 1.1-1.9 made no difference, but 2 did INDEED:-) > > > >

Re: Changed font size interpretation

2012-12-22 Thread Dave Yeo
On 12/22/12 09:58 pm, L. David Baron wrote: On Saturday 2012-12-22 19:49 -0800, Dave Yeo wrote: This is part of localization, set things like separators, date formats and such depending on your locale. For me the separator has to be a decimal. And yes there is a lot of people working on translat

Re: Changed font size interpretation

2012-12-22 Thread L. David Baron
On Saturday 2012-12-22 19:49 -0800, Dave Yeo wrote: > This is part of localization, set things like separators, date > formats and such depending on your locale. For me the separator has > to be a decimal. And yes there is a lot of people working on > translating various parts of the browser for va

Re: Changed font size interpretation

2012-12-22 Thread Dave Yeo
Allan wrote: For a long time, I never understood how that worked for you. I have same problem here, that just about all websites uses too small fonts. When I tried that setting 1.1-1.9 made no difference, but 2 did INDEED:-) Today it just stroke me to try something odd, so I tried 1,1-1,9 instea

Re: Changed font size interpretation

2012-12-22 Thread Allan
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 00:53:04 UTC, "Alex Taylor" wrote: > On Sat, 22 Dec 2012 23:59:52 UTC, "Allan" wrote: > > > > > Ah, now that is useful! Yes, even just upping it to 1.1 makes a world > > > > of difference. Thanks! > > > > > > Today it just stroke me to try something odd, so I tried 1,1-

Re: Changed font size interpretation

2012-12-22 Thread Alex Taylor
On Sat, 22 Dec 2012 23:59:52 UTC, "Allan" wrote: > > > Ah, now that is useful! Yes, even just upping it to 1.1 makes a world > > > of difference. Thanks! > > > > Today it just stroke me to try something odd, so I tried 1,1-1,9 > > instead. Now, I see your results, and this setting is indeed v

Re: Changed font size interpretation

2012-12-22 Thread Allan
On Sat, 22 Dec 2012 15:41:47 UTC, "Allan" wrote: > On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 11:22:13 UTC, "Alex Taylor" > wrote: > > > On Tue, 31 May 2011 12:44:20 UTC, Felix Miata > > > > wrote: > > > > > > As if I wasn't squinting enough at all these braindead pages with their > > > > hard-coded point sizes

Re: Changed font size interpretation

2012-12-22 Thread L. David Baron
On Saturday 2012-12-22 09:41 -0600, Allan wrote: > For a long time, I never understood how that worked for you. > I have same problem here, that just about all websites uses too small fonts. > When I tried that setting 1.1-1.9 made no difference, but 2 did INDEED :-) > > Today it just stroke me to

Re: Changed font size interpretation

2012-12-22 Thread Allan
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 11:22:13 UTC, "Alex Taylor" wrote: > On Tue, 31 May 2011 12:44:20 UTC, Felix Miata > > wrote: > > > > As if I wasn't squinting enough at all these braindead pages with their > > > hard-coded point sizes already. Now it's going to be even worse. > > > Please tell me I c