Re: Intent to implement: webserial api

2014-07-14 Thread tzikis
Ah, sorry for not being too straightforward Erik. The answer is no (as far as the API design goes, but the implementation should follow that ofc) There is actually a very nice image explaining this on our messageboard, but I'm on my phone so I'll do my best to explain this with a similar exampl

Re: Intent to implement: webserial api

2014-07-14 Thread tzikis
On Monday, July 14, 2014 2:00:47 PM UTC+3, Gervase Markham wrote: > On 13/07/14 18:35, Vasilis wrote: > > > Jonas, I would be really interested in your thoughts. Try as we might > > > (in the WebSerial API docs, at least), noone could actually think of > > > a use case where providing access to

Re: Intent to implement: webserial api

2014-07-13 Thread tzikis
Hi guys, As the guy who originally started the WebSerial API discussion, if i could give my two cents, I agree with Dave. It's virtually impossible to separate access per-port. It's all or nothing. We had this same discussion (actually, long bikesheding) on the WebSerial API docs as well, but t