Re: build fail @ "xulrunner-sdk/include/mozilla/Atomics.h" when using xulrunner-sdk >= v25.0, on linux/64 with gcc 4.7x/4.8x

iiuc, any app built against new xulrunner will need to be aware of this. @ a downstream app, a dev suggested "Sounds like something that xulrunner should provide in there .pc file. So that when pkg-config --cflags xulrunner is run (which configure does do). This value should come out." sounds

Re: build fail @ "xulrunner-sdk/include/mozilla/Atomics.h" when using xulrunner-sdk >= v25.0, on linux/64 with gcc 4.7x/4.8x

> FWIW, it looks like Mozilla uses the former (gnu++0x) in the build system: > http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/build/autoconf/toolchain.m4?mark=152-153#145 Good enough, thanks! ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org ht

Re: build fail @ "xulrunner-sdk/include/mozilla/Atomics.h" when using xulrunner-sdk >= v25.0, on linux/64 with gcc 4.7x/4.8x

@Jeff reading here, http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html adding either export CXXFLAGS="-std=gnu++0x" or export CXXFLAGS="-std=gnu++11" both seem to work. From Mozilla's perspective -- is one preferable? ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-p

build fail @ "xulrunner-sdk/include/mozilla/Atomics.h" when using xulrunner-sdk >= v25.0, on linux/64 with gcc 4.7x/4.8x

hi, I've installed,, /usr/local/xulrunner-sdk/bin/xulrunner --version Mozilla XULRunner 25.0.1 - 20131112160018 on uname -a Linux andromeda 3.7.10-1.16-desktop #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri May 31 20:21:23 UTC 2013 (97c14ba) x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux