>
> > the sample tests (xpcshell-tests) are extremely complicated to adapt
>
> That seems like it would be a problem in any new thing too, right?
Actually no. I adapted our gtests in less than an hour.
>
> > and we can't easily use it with AFL.
>
> Just to satisfy my curiosity, what is AFL?
> To what extent are we fuzzing things like our url parser and other necko
> bits via our existing shell (xpcshell) that exposes all that stuff?
>
> -Boris
Not at all. xpcshell is not very useful for fuzzing. It is slow, the sample
tests (xpcshell-tests) are extremely complicated to adapt and
2 matches
Mail list logo
