Re: Intent to ship: Element.animate

2016-04-19 Thread bbirtles
On Tuesday, 19 April 2016 22:03:48 UTC+9, smaug wrote: > > This is a temporary situation because I don't want to have to back out the > > whole Element.animate feature due to compat issues from the 'Animation' > > interface name. After we have shipped Element.animate we can ship the > > Animatio

Re: Intent to ship: Element.animate

2016-04-18 Thread bbirtles
On Tuesday, 19 April 2016 02:23:54 UTC+9, smaug wrote: > On 04/18/2016 05:12 AM, Brian Birtles wrote: > > In Firefox 48 I intend to turn Element.animate on by default. > > > > We have been developing the Web Animations API behind the > > dom.animations-api.core.enabled preference and have introdu