Re: Critical - XULRunner 34 fails with "Couldn't load XPCOM" in MacOSX

1105044 On Friday, November 28, 2014 9:07:09 PM UTC+8, Benjamin Smedberg wrote: > On 11/27/2014 10:38 PM, allencb...@gmail.com wrote: > > I've reported this in bugzilla. Any one has any workaround? > > I commented in the bug > (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1105044). This is proba

Re: Critical - XULRunner 34 fails with "Couldn't load XPCOM" in MacOSX

I've reported this in bugzilla. Any one has any workaround? ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Critical - XULRunner 34 fails with "Couldn't load XPCOM" in MacOSX

The new XULRunner 34 fails with "Couldn't load XPCOM" error when running MacOSX. It works fine in Win32. Besides, FF34 works fine too. Anyone any idea what caused this? XULRunner 33 works fine in MacOSX too. I'm using OS X Yosemite. ___ dev-pla

GGC not enabled in XULRunner

The confvars.sh in XULrunner doesn't have JSGC_GENERATIONAL enabled. As a result, XULrunner doesn't have GGC enabled although the code has been there since v31. I've filed a bug in bugzila (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1063911) bug but haven't got any feedback so far. Can som

Re: What does BC stand for?

On Thursday, March 21, 2013 10:21:09 AM UTC+8, RyanVM wrote: > On 3/14/2013 7:14 PM, allencb...@gmail.com wrote: > > > Any idea what the tentative timeframe of rolling this out? in firefox 23 ? > > > > > > > The goal is Firefox 23, yes. Am I right to assume that the XULrunner 23 daily build i

Re: What does BC stand for?

Any idea what the tentative timeframe of rolling this out? in firefox 23 ? On Sunday, March 10, 2013 6:18:23 AM UTC+8, RyanVM wrote: > On 3/8/2013 9:02 PM, allencb...@gmail.com wrote: > > > Thanks. Is there a build for XULrunner? > > > > > > > No, you'd have to roll your own.

Re: What does BC stand for?

Thanks. Is there a build for XULrunner? On Sunday, March 3, 2013 1:29:44 AM UTC+8, RyanVM wrote: > On 3/1/2013 10:18 PM, allencb...@gmail.com wrote: > > > Is there a binary for download? > > > > > > > Nightlies are available from the link below. > > http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/fi

Re: What does BC stand for?

Is there a binary for download? On Tuesday, February 26, 2013 9:04:54 PM UTC+8, RyanVM wrote: > On 2/26/2013 5:39 AM, allencb...@gmail.com wrote: > > > In arewefastyet.com (which is the website for posting the latest Mozilla > > Javascript performance), there's a new branch of js called (BC + Io

What does BC stand for?

In arewefastyet.com (which is the website for posting the latest Mozilla Javascript performance), there's a new branch of js called (BC + Ion + TI) in addition to (JM + TI + Ion).I suppose JM stands for JaegerMonkey, TI stands for Type-inference, and Ion stands for IonMonkey. What does BC s

daily build of xulrunner runtime unstable trunk for mac platform broken

The daily build of xulrunner runtime for mac in the unstable trunk (21a and 22a) are broken (only 46 bytes). Any idea what the problem is? ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

xulrunner 15 no longer support Mac OSX?

No more installer since ver 14. Does anyone manage to get 15.0 p and running in Mac OSX? ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

xulrunner 15 doesn't start in Mac OSX Mountain Lion

My app used to work ok with xulrunner 14. When I updated it with xulrunner 15, it doesn't start up. The console shows the following messages: com.app.launchd.peruser.501: ([0x0-0xabfabf].testapp[7866]): Exited with code: 255 Any idea what this is about? Anything config files (like info.plis