(reftest) Renaming reftest-print to reftest-paged

2017-07-27 Thread Tobias Schneider
In preparation of landing proper support to create print tests via https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1299848 we renamed reftest-print to reftest-paged. The reason for this was that reftest-print is not actually testing real printed output but rather making sure layout is done correct in

Re: Intent to ship: IntersectionObserver API

2017-04-05 Thread Tobias Schneider
://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1353529. I think its safe to go ahead and finally enabling this feature by default. On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 7:32 AM, Tobias Schneider wrote: > We just successfully run another experiment, enabling the > IntersectionObserver API for 50% of our Nightl

Re: Intent to ship: IntersectionObserver API

2017-03-24 Thread Tobias Schneider
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 7:38 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > > > On 3/15/17 1:32 PM, Tobias Schneider wrote: > > >> 2.3) Platform tests are in the process of being upstreamed by Google ( > > >> https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/4384). > > > > &

Intent to ship: IntersectionObserver API

2017-03-15 Thread Tobias Schneider
As of March 14 I intend to turn the IntersectionObserver API on by default on all platforms. It has been developed behind the dom.IntersectionObserver.enabled preference. Chrome is already shipping it since 51. Manual QA and fuzzing was successfully completed ( https://wiki.mozilla.org/QA/Intersec

Re: Intent to ship: IntersectionObserver API

2017-03-15 Thread Tobias Schneider
/pull/4384). Will include them asap. 3) Yeah, we have some tests in place. But there wasn't an official security review yet. Who to be the person best to talk to? On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 3/15/17 1:30 AM, Tobias Schneider wrote: > >> As of Ma

Intent to ship: IntersectionObserver API

2017-03-14 Thread Tobias Schneider
As of March 14 I intend to turn the IntersectionObserver API on by default on all platforms. It has been developed behind the dom.IntersectionObserver.enabled preference. Chrome is already shipping it since 51. Manual QA and fuzzing was successfully completed ( https://wiki.mozilla.org/QA/Intersec

Re: Intent to ship: Canvas CSS/SVG filters

2016-06-02 Thread Tobias Schneider
wrote: > Can you also get results on Windows? > > -Jeff > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Tobias Schneider > wrote: > >> I got the following numbers running >> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/55355076/benchmark.html?filters=true >> on my MacBook Pro (Mid

Re: Intent to ship: Canvas CSS/SVG filters

2016-06-01 Thread Tobias Schneider
: 10fps Cairo:8fps Chrome Canary 53: 3fps On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Jeff Muizelaar wrote: > How does performance compare to Chrome? > > -Jeff > > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Tobias Schneider > wrote: > >>

Intent to ship: Canvas CSS/SVG filters

2016-05-27 Thread Tobias Schneider
I intend to turn Canvas CSS/SVG filters on by default on all platforms. It has been developed behind the canvas.filters.enabled preference. Google's Chrome is already shipping this in version 52. Related bugs: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=927892 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_b

Intent to ship: Support for color-adjust CSS property

2016-03-04 Thread Tobias Schneider
As of Firefox 47 I intend to ship support for color-adjust on all platforms. Chrome is already shipping this as -webkit-print-color-adjust. The color-adjust CSS property allow pages to opt in to printing background colors and images. Chrome is already shipping this and Google Docs is using it in p