Upcoming on Bugzilla: reorganized & redesigned bug page

Hello, As you know, bugzilla.mozilla.org has evolved to meet the needs of various projects, and the current bug detail page seems cluttered with so many fields. Making changes to a familiar UI may confuse some of you, but we feel like it’s time to get it improve

New Custom Search UI now available on Bugzilla

Hi there, We have enhanced search features on Bugzilla over the past months, because we know people search a lot. I want to let you know some of our goodies recently added to make your life easier. * New Custom Search UIon the Advanced Search page

Re: Improving our usage of Bugzilla

An update on the bug type and regression fields: Because of Firefox 66 and the subsequent 66.0.1 pwn2own chemspill, we decided to delay the deployment of the change. We are now ready to deploy the new bug type and regressions/regressed-by fields to production Bugzilla later this week. A one-ti

Re: Improving our usage of Bugzilla

Due to unexpected circumstances, we couldn’t deploy and migrate the bug type field this week. Will try again next week as soon as on Monday. Thanks, -Kohei On 2019-03-26 8:05 p.m., Kohei Yoshino wrote: An update on the bug type and regression fields: Because of Firefox 66 and the subsequent

Re: Improving our usage of Bugzilla

The User Story field will be soon removed from the new bug page. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1525376 -Kohei On 2019-03-12 1:47 p.m., Daniel Veditz wrote: The "User Story" field can be (ab?)used for all those things. If the bug is not an "enhancement" it's likely blank and just

Re: Improving our usage of Bugzilla

Yes! You can use “type” like this: https://bugzilla.allizom.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=type:defect https://bugzilla.allizom.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=type:enhancement https://bugzilla.allizom.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=type:task And “regressed_by” and “regressions” should also work. -Kohei

Re: How do I file a bug?

s/participation [2] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-webdev On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 6:43 PM Kohei Yoshino mailto:kohei.yosh...@gmail.com>> wrote: As a longtime contributor, I’m also concerned about the current situation. The contribution starting point (or Mozilla’s information archi

Re: How do I file a bug?

As a longtime contributor, I’m also concerned about the current situation. The contribution starting point (or Mozilla’s information architecture in general) is a total mess. https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/contribute/signup/ https://codetribute.mozilla.org/ https://activate.mozilla.community/ ht

Re: Intent to unship: Visibility of window.content to untrusted code

A similar story: `window.controllers` was removed with Firefox 29 but added back to Firefox 30 because it had been widely used for UA detection. `window.content` might cause the same compatibility issue, but anyway, it's difficult to guess the impact from GitHub search results... https://www.f

Re: Intent to disable service workers and push in 52 ESR

Do we already have a bug for this? Firefox 52 will be shipped just in 4 weeks. On 2017-01-18 10:49 AM, Ben Kelly wrote: I'd like to disable service workers in 52 ESR. This would also require disabling push notifications. A year ago we decided to disable service workers in 45 ESR because it was

Removing navigator.buildID?

So the Battery Status API has just been removed, I think now is a good time to think about navigator.buildID again, which bug [1] has been inactive for a whole year. 4 years ago, Firefox 16 removed a minor version number from the user agent string to mitigate fingerprinting [2][3]. However, th

Re: Context3D not available

It's a known issue. See https://www.fxsitecompat.com/en-CA/docs/2016/flash-is-forced-windowless-mode-on-firefox-for-64-bit-windows-affecting-stage-3d/ for details. On 2016-09-06 6:21 AM, witchhazel...@gmail.com wrote: Context3D not available! Possible reasons: wrong wmode or missing device su

Re: Intent to deprecate: MacOS 10.6-10.8 support

Today's announcement from Mozilla: https://blog.mozilla.org/futurereleases/2016/04/29/update-on-firefox-support-for-os-x/ The decision is fine but why don't they update this thread? (I know, Mozilla is very bad at communication.) -Kohei ___ dev-platfo