under 8 minutes, so if you
haven't heard from the bot in a while it means your patch is probably fine:
https://p.datadoghq.com/sb/NsBIKn-240d11775d25dce0ef2c47d4b7ce0ae0
Jan
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:10 PM Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 05:06:07PM +0200, Jan Keromnes wrote
d the patch (e.g. after
rebasing it).
Note that the bot doesn't publish anything if no defect was detected. A
complete analysis generally takes a few minutes.
Jan
Am 17.07.2018 16:55 schrieb "Jean-Yves Avenard" :
Hi
On 17 Jul 2018, at 3:22 pm, Jan Keromnes wrote:
TL;DR -- “re
TL;DR -- “reviewbot” is now enabled in Phabricator. It reports potential
defects in pending patches for Firefox.
Last year, we announced Code Review Bot (“reviewbot”, née “clangbot”), a
Taskcluster bot that analyzes every patch submitted to MozReview, in order
to automatically detect and report co
Thanks glandium!
Yes, reporting defects that are expanded from macros generates a lot of
noise, and it's not always an issue we can fix (e.g. when the macro comes
from third-party code). So we've decided to stop reporting these, and the
fix was merged in time for tomorrow's push to production.
TL
d, Oct 4, 2017 at 7:14 PM, Ehsan Akhgari
> wrote:
>
>> On 10/04/2017 03:17 AM, Jan Keromnes wrote:
>>
>>> TL;DR -- We wrote a static analysis bot for MozReview ("clangbot") and
>>> it's
>>> about to complain about any patches that would in
ing the fix to production, so the bot should stop sending them soon.
Apologies for the bugmail noise.
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 10/4/17 3:17 AM, Jan Keromnes wrote:
>
>> Please report any bugs with the bot here: https://bit.ly/2y9N9Vx
>>
>
> No
that are not using MozReview. Will those
> patches be analyzed after landing?
>
> Nick
>
> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Jan Keromnes wrote:
>
>> TL;DR -- We wrote a static analysis bot for MozReview ("clangbot") and
>> it's
>> about to complain a
TL;DR -- We wrote a static analysis bot for MozReview ("clangbot") and it's
about to complain about any patches that would introduce new C/C++ code
defects to Firefox.
Please report any bugs with the bot here: https://bit.ly/2y9N9Vx
In an effort to improve the quality of Firefox, we want to catch
On Firefox OS devices, special fonts like "Fira Sans" and "Fira Mono"
are used.
On desktop environments (Simulator / B2G desktop), different fonts are used.
We are trying to fix this in bug 992210, but we are not familiar with
how fonts work in Firefox, and need some help.
In Gaia, generic fon
I discovered this by chance today, shift+clicking the line numbers to
reference a code range in a bug.
Had no idea it was so recent - thanks a lot!
Jan
On Thursday, March 13, 2014 5:46:14 PM, Erik Rose wrote:
A lot of you have asked for the ability to select and share ranges within
source file
10 matches
Mail list logo
