Re: Extension to integrate Searchfox features in Phabricator

2018-10-10 Thread Bobby Holley
I noticed this extension seems to be causing significant jank while typing comments into phabricator. I'll send a profile to Marco, but just an FYI for anyone else who's using it. On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 6:03 AM Marco Castelluccio wrote: > I've built an (experimental) WebExtension to integrate so

Re: Intent to unship: mozAutoGainControl & mozNoiseSuppression constraints (and AGC=on by default)

2018-10-10 Thread Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
On 10/10/18 4:29 PM, Mike Taylor wrote: Hi Jan-Ivar, On 10/10/18 9:48 AM, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey wrote: The most likely net fallout of, if any, would be sites that UA-sniff AND rely on the legacy Firefox names ONLY to turn OFF audio processing. These are likely to be specialty sites dealing with th

Re: Intent to unship: mozAutoGainControl & mozNoiseSuppression constraints (and AGC=on by default)

2018-10-10 Thread Mike Taylor
Hi Jan-Ivar, On 10/10/18 9:48 AM, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey wrote: The most likely net fallout of, if any, would be sites that UA-sniff AND rely on the legacy Firefox names ONLY to turn OFF audio processing. These are likely to be specialty sites dealing with things like music rather than your typical

Soft code freeze for Firefox 64 starts October 15

2018-10-10 Thread Julien Cristau
Hi all, On October 15, we will be merging Firefox 64 from mozilla-central to beta for the first time. In order to avoid invalidating the testing we get out of late Nightly and the early Developer Edition builds and to ensure that we can roll out Beta 64 to a wider audience with confidence, we'd li

Intent to unship: mozAutoGainControl & mozNoiseSuppression constraints (and AGC=on by default)

2018-10-10 Thread Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
TL;DR: anticipate very low impact. We don't have telemetry for these, but we've been warning about these in web console since 55. [1] These are legacy names for the standard autoGainControl and noiseSuppression constraints we've supported since 55. [1] You can try it out here https://blog.

Re: Intent to unship: most -moz-appearance values not supported by other UAs / spec

2018-10-10 Thread Jonathan Watt
Sounds great, and that all looks good to me. Thanks for following up on this, Mats! On 10/10/2018 13:28, Mats Palmgren wrote: > Hi, > > In bug 1496720 I intend to unship most -moz-appearance values that > aren't supported by other UAs / spec. These are mostly XUL-related > values that we use in

Intent to unship: most -moz-appearance values not supported by other UAs / spec

2018-10-10 Thread Mats Palmgren
Hi, In bug 1496720 I intend to unship most -moz-appearance values that aren't supported by other UAs / spec. These are mostly XUL-related values that we use internally in our UI (and they will continue to be available for that purpose). Also, since -webkit-appearance is now an alias for -moz-ap