Of course, happy to get us back to a good place and very sorry for all of
the inconvenience. We haven't had any further requests for exclusions for
the revert: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1464312. It would
be helpful to get any other requests in asap.
Dylan will be checking the ti
On Sun, 20 May 2018 at 19:40, Karl Tomlinson wrote:
> On Fri, 18 May 2018 13:13:04 -0400, Chris AtLee wrote:
> > IMO, it's not reasonable to keep CI builds around forever, so the
question
> > is then how long to keep them? 1 year doesn't quite cover a full ESR
cycle,
> > would 18 months be suffi
On 5/25/18 5:07 PM, Erin Lancaster wrote:
Here’s where we are with timing/process for the revert:
Erin,
Thank you for all the work you've put in on this. I know it hasn't been
easy dealing with this, and I really appreciate it.
-Boris
___
dev-pla
The New checker features look really promising. Yes, more of this stuff in
C++ is very welcome.
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Chris Peterson
wrote:
> On 2018-05-23 1:35 PM, Botond Ballo wrote:
>
>> There is also work being done in this area outside the formal
>> standards process, in the form
The continued work on the 2D GFx API as a C++ standard is concerning. Since
we're sending a GFx engineer to the committee, and AFAIK we're not going to
use such an API to build our GFx stack, the arguments against continued
development seem very compelling:
-
there are no clear users or dem
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Botond Ballo wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 4:05 PM, Jet Villegas
> wrote:
> > I'd rather see the committee focus on things like object lifetime
> management
> > so we don't have to port everything to Rust just to get basic memory
> safety
> > guarantees. How m
You may already know that the Low-Level Tools team support important tools and code infrastructure. Lately we’ve also been improving our rustc/clang (LLVM) story and I’d like bring everyone up to date.
There are a lot of important and interesting things going on:
Hi Georg, thanks for rolling this up! As you know Android / Mobile is a
huge focus for all of Mozilla in 2018 - can you please call out which of
your 2018 focus areas incorporate improvements for Android / Mobile?
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:20 AM, Georg Fritzsche
wrote:
> As the Firefox data eng
8 matches
Mail list logo
