Hi,
all resolved now and will update now autoland to m-c on a regular base!
Thanks to gps for resolving the problem!
Cheers,
- tomcat
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Carsten Book wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just in case someone wonders (and since i got pinged by a couple of
> people).
>
> Currently due
I hope it could support MSVC one day as well, and support distribute any
job to macOS machines as well.
In my case, I use Windows as my main development environment, and I have
a personally powerful enough MacBook Pro. (Actually I additionally have
a retired MBP which should still work.) And if it
In my case I'm noticing an improvement with my mac distributing jobs to a
single Ubuntu machine but not compiling itself (Right now we don't support
distributing mac jobs to other mac, primarily because we just want to
maintain one homogeneous cluster).
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Gijs Kruitbo
I'm pretty sure he means one extra machine. For example, if you have a
laptop and a desktop, just adding the desktop into the network at home will
still dramatically improve build times (I think).
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Gijs Kruitbosch
wrote:
> On 04/07/2016 22:06, Benoit Girard wrote:
On 04/07/2016 22:06, Benoit Girard wrote:
So to emphasize, if you compile a lot and only have one or two machines on your
100mps or 1gbps LAN you'll still see big benefits.
I don't understand how this benefits anyone with just one machine
(that's compatible...) - there's no other machines to
This barely works in a office with 10MB/sec wireless uplink. Ideally you
want machines to be accessible on a gigabit LAN. It's more about bandwidth
throughput than latency AFAIK. i.e. can you *upload* dozens of 2-4MB
compressed pre-processed file faster than you compile it? I'd imagine
unless you c
Yes!
Part of the build project work that I regularly email this list[1] we have
it on our roadmap to have the same distributed cache that we use in
automation available for engineers who are working on C++ code. We have
completed our rewrite and will be putting the initial work through try over
th
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Gijs Kruitbosch
wrote:
> What about people not lucky enough to (regularly) work in an office,
> including but not limited to our large number of volunteers? Do we intend to
> set up something public for people to use?
By all accounts, the available distributed com
What about people not lucky enough to (regularly) work in an office,
including but not limited to our large number of volunteers? Do we
intend to set up something public for people to use?
~ Gijs
On 04/07/2016 20:09, Michael Layzell wrote:
If you saw the platform lightning talk by Jeff and Eh
On 2016-06-30 9:50 PM, Karl Dubost wrote:
Gregory,
Le 1 juil. 2016 à 09:33, Gregory Szorc a écrit :
I want the site to publish a "URL translation map"
for URL patterns so whole URL namespaces can be bulk updated.
Interesting idea.
Probably something to explain in a wiki page somewhere on
ht
If you saw the platform lightning talk by Jeff and Ehsan in London, you
will know that in the Toronto office, we have set up a distributed compiler
called `icecc`, which allows us to perform a clobber build of
mozilla-central in around 3:45. After some work, we have managed to get it
so that macOS
Gijs Kruitbosch wrote on 07/01/2016 11:47 PM:
> On 01/07/2016 20:52, Henrik Skupin wrote:
>> I do not see any single merge of autoland to mozilla-central
>
> https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=mozilla-central&revision=61ed5c0d64195c58de57489147046aeaf14252d3
>
> is a merge from autoland t
Hi,
just in case someone wonders (and since i got pinged by a couple of people).
Currently due to https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1283798#c5 we
cannot update/merge/rebase autoland to mozilla-central currently.
We are working on this and gps is aware of this - but due to the US holid
13 matches
Mail list logo
