On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:07 AM, wrote:
>
> https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/file/3e04659fdf6aef792f7cf9840189c6c38d08d1e8/mfbt/UniquePtr.h#l182
>
> "To unconditionally transfer ownership of a UniquePtr into a method, use a
> |UniquePtr| argument. To conditionally transfer ownership of a
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> Implement Client-Hints HTTP header
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=935216
Client-Hints is negotation on the HTTP layer that goes beyond
reversible bit transformation (i.e. it's not like gzip or Brotli). I
continue to believe
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 05:23:21PM +0200, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> You say you don't see #5 happening. Do you see #4 happening? If not,
> what do you see happening?
At this point, I'm wondering if the best outcome wouldn't be 6) Distros
die. I'm almost not joking.
> > LTS distros do update Firefox
I am tempted to assume |t| will be an empty shell after foo(Move(t)) if I don't
see the prototype foo(T&&).
For |bar(already_AddRefed&&)|, it is also possible for the callsite to say
|bar(r.forget())| without forcing the caller to handle conditional ownership
transfer which won't be caught unti
Greetings,
erahm recently wrote a nice blog post with measurements showing the
overhead of
enabling multiple content processes:
http://www.erahm.org/2016/02/11/memory-usage-of-firefox-with-e10s-enabled/
The overhead is high -- 8 content processes *doubles* our physical memory
usage -- which limi
In bug 1256408 I've landed code to allow adding *in-tree* platform
micro-benchmarks for XUL code in less than 10 lines. These are just GTest
where the execution time is reported to perfherder. This makes it easy to
add low level platform micro-benchmarks for testing things that Talos is
not well su
The two outstanding bugs are closed!
We have one bug remaining that we are tracking related to metrics. I've
consulted the owners of that issue and they've agreed that it is ok if that
work lands shortly after we switch to Tier 1 for Linux Debug builds.
We're now planning to switch TC builds to T
On Saturday, March 12, 2016 at 8:59:20 AM UTC-8, Bobby Holley wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Terrence Cole wrote:
>
> > We've had this conversation several times in the last few years and I think
> > I've finally figured out why it has always felt subtly wrong.
> >
> > Our share of use
On 2016-03-18 6:43 PM, Yuhong Bao wrote:
>
>> On 2016-03-17 8:35 PM, Yuhong Bao wrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 3:30 PM,
mailto:yuhongbao_...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
What about the depreciation of XP SP2?
Results from bug 1124017 say XP SP2 still works on binaries built with
>
On 2016-03-17 8:35 PM, Yuhong Bao wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 3:30 PM,
>> mailto:yuhongbao_...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
>> What about the depreciation of XP SP2?
>>
>> Results from bug 1124017 say XP SP2 still works on binaries built with
>> VS2015u1. This may not always hold true. So we will
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 1:59 AM, wrote:
> > In particular, as
> > noted in this thread, you can't bootstrap off of either the current
> > version of Rust or the previous. This is actually a problem that could
> > be fixed in about one release cycle.
>
> Nice! I didn't realize it's that close t
11 matches
Mail list logo
