The patches I am working on already use Bobby Holley's OriginAttributes, in
fact we use the origin attribute on the nsIPrincipal, and only expose an
nsIPrincipal from the API.
Internally, we use the origin attribute for serialization, but to external
consumers of the API, all that is available are
I've only seen those when anything tries to print to the console after a
test has called do_test_finish and in that case I suspect it is due to
xpcshell shutting down, etc.
Robert
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:35 PM, ishikawa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am not sure where to ask and so ask three mailing lis
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:18 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 6/30/15 5:00 PM, Richard Barnes wrote:
>> Second, when we implement new web platform features, they will be enabled
>> only on secure contexts.
>
> Might I ask who this "we" is (I don't recall general DOM module owner buy-in
> on this, bu
Hi,
I am not sure where to ask and so ask three mailing lists.
First off, TB 38.0.1 after many months of waiting solved many outstanding
issues,
Great.
I hope we can correct many remaining issues in the months ahead.
I am testing full debug build of C-C TB locally.
This is done by running
|make
Hi!
Just FYI
The try result [1] shows only
/html/semantics/embedded-content/the-img-element/current-pixel-density/basic.html,
but /service-workers/service-worker/fetch-csp.https.html is another
suspicion.
See
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#?job_id=8942921&repo=try
and
https://
On 6/30/2015 6:01 AM, Axel Hecht wrote:
On 6/30/15 9:13 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:19:08PM -0700, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering what the largest chunks of code there are in the
codebase that are candidates for removal, i.e. probably with a bit of
work but
On 6/30/2015 4:35 PM, Jeff Muizelaar wrote:
I believe this is predicated on removing the implicit conversion from
nsRefPtr to T*
You'd get the same benefit, I think, by making operator T*() && =
delete;, syntax which is accepted on gcc 4.8.1+, clang, and MSVC 2015 IIRC.
--
Joshua Cranmer
Thu
Well, the https://pypi.python.org/pypi/mozbuild is not enough to building
mozilla source tree, that's why I created mozbuildfull package.
The intention of mozbuildfull is to creating tags version of
mozbuild that can building related version of mozilla source tree and
distributed with
XUL SDK, so
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Ehsan Akhgari
> wrote:
>> On 2015-06-30 6:04 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>>
>>> There are actually one downside with this change.
>>>
>>> It means that if a user denies access to https://website.com to use
>>>
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> I wonder, has the subject of double-keying been raised in this
> context? It comes up frequently in this context. And when I say
> double-keying, I mean forming a key from the tuple of the requesting
> principal and the top level browsing c
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> On 2015-06-30 6:04 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> There are actually one downside with this change.
>>
>> It means that if a user denies access to https://website.com to use
>> cookies, then http://website.com will still have full ability to
Web-platform-tests are now running in debug builds on try only. However
due to some teething problems, they are not currently all green. This is
expected to be fixed in the next 24 hours but, in the meantime, if you
see some orange that seems unrelated to your change, particularly orange
that l
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> I personally am not sure if that is a sound idea for all permission types.
> It's probably the right thing for geolocation, but not for cookies.
As I understand it, the key for permission manager is a simple string.
Rather than make new APIs
On 2015-06-30 6:55 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
I wonder, has the subject of double-keying been raised in this
context? It comes up frequently in this context. And when I say
double-keying, I mean forming a key from the tuple of the requesting
principal and the top level browsing context principal
On 2015-06-30 6:04 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
There are actually one downside with this change.
It means that if a user denies access to https://website.com to use
cookies, then http://website.com will still have full ability to use
cookies since it's a different origin.
That is a good point.
A
I wonder, has the subject of double-keying been raised in this
context? It comes up frequently in this context. And when I say
double-keying, I mean forming a key from the tuple of the requesting
principal and the top level browsing context principal (though origin
may suffice).
If there are disr
There are actually one downside with this change.
It means that if a user denies access to https://website.com to use
cookies, then http://website.com will still have full ability to use
cookies since it's a different origin.
For a DENY policy it often makes more sense to deny a whole domain
name
On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 9:01:45 AM UTC-4, kgu...@mozilla.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 3:41:43 AM UTC-4, Kearwood "Kip" Gilbert wrote:
> > Would anyone be opposed to combining the Matrix4x4 class and gfx3DMatrix?
> > Rather than adding support for transforms and projections that
I believe this is predicated on removing the implicit conversion from
nsRefPtr to T*
-Jeff
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> Will it ever be possible to eliminate TemporaryRef and use moves instead?
>
> Rob
> --
> oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oi
Will it ever be possible to eliminate TemporaryRef and use moves instead?
Rob
--
oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo
owoiotoho oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro owoiololo oboeo
osouobojoeocoto otooo ojouodogomoeonoto.o oAogoaoiono,o oaonoyooonoeo
owohooo
On 6/30/15 5:00 PM, Richard Barnes wrote:
Second, when we implement new web platform features, they will be enabled
only on secure contexts.
Might I ask who this "we" is (I don't recall general DOM module owner
buy-in on this, but maybe I missed it?) what the definition of "new web
platform f
yes, please!
On 06/30/2015 06:46 AM, nsm.nik...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Target release: Firefox 41
Implementation and shipping bug:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=916893
Specification: https://notifications.spec.whatwg.org/
Gecko already implements support for the Notif
As a next step toward deprecating non-secure HTTP [1], we are making the
following two changes to how we develop new web platform features,
effective immediately:
First, when we work on developing specifications for new web platform
features, we will make sure that these specifications require sec
Bug 1161627 has landed on inbound, which converts all uses of
mozilla::TemporaryRef to already_AddRefed and removes TemporaryRef.
(already_AddRefed moved to MFBT several months ago, in case you were
wondering about the spreading of XPCOM concepts.) TemporaryRef was added
for easier porting of code
Historically our permissions database has used host names as part of the
permission entry, which means that if we stored a permission for
http://example.com, it would also apply to https://example.com (and
http://example.com:8080 for that matter). This is undesirable specially
once you note that t
The mozbuild Python package is available on PyPI:
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/mozbuild
It's also possible to obtain an archive of the source from hg.mozilla.org.
See the instructions for the "archive" command/URL at
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/help/hgweb.
I would strongly prefer to no
On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 3:41:43 AM UTC-4, Kearwood "Kip" Gilbert wrote:
> Would anyone be opposed to combining the Matrix4x4 class and gfx3DMatrix?
> Rather than adding support for transforms and projections that involve
> vertices behind the w=0 plane to gfx3DMatrix, it may be cleaner to r
On 6/30/15 9:13 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:19:08PM -0700, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering what the largest chunks of code there are in the
codebase that are candidates for removal, i.e. probably with a bit of
work but not too much.
One that comes to mind is
Would anyone be opposed to combining the Matrix4x4 class and gfx3DMatrix?
Rather than adding support for transforms and projections that involve vertices
behind the w=0 plane to gfx3DMatrix, it may be cleaner to refactor affected
call-sites to use Matrix4x4 instead. The remaining references to
There's a bunch of XPConnect code that can go away when we finally kills
nsDOMClassInfo. We're 95% of the way there, just lacking will to push it
over the line.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:19 PM, Nicholas Nethercote <
n.netherc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering what the largest chunks o
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:19:08PM -0700, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering what the largest chunks of code there are in the
> codebase that are candidates for removal, i.e. probably with a bit of
> work but not too much.
>
> One that comes to mind is rdf/ (see
> https://bugzilla
31 matches
Mail list logo
