On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 7:55 PM, Vladan D wrote:
> I asked Avi to work on pausing GC/CC during scrolling in Q3 & Q4 2014. I
> still think it's relevant but process-per-tab will give some of the same
> benefits
>
Olli is working on creating some kind of unified scheduler for the giant
mess of GC
On Sunday, June 28, 2015 at 4:09:18 PM UTC-4, David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote:
> Actually, I was just thinking about introducing a "priority-to-60fps"
> mode, activated e.g. while the user is scrolling the foreground tab, or
> perhaps during animations in the foreground tab.
>
> Whenever we are run
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >
> > BTW, wasn't there an effort a few couple years ago, to move content
> > event loop in different threads for different tabs? What happened to
> > that?
> >
>
> If you are referring t
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> BTW, wasn't there an effort a few couple years ago, to move content
> event loop in different threads for different tabs? What happened to
> that?
>
If you are referring to bug 715376 (and related), those patches are still
in my queue, fully
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 06:23:30AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 10:09:04PM +0200, David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote:
> > On 28/06/15 20:39, Randell Jesup wrote:
> > >>> I was under the impression that because e10s is only a single process
> > >>> for
> > >> all content (at leas
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 10:09:04PM +0200, David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote:
> On 28/06/15 20:39, Randell Jesup wrote:
> >>> I was under the impression that because e10s is only a single process for
> >> all content (at least right now) a background tab can still negatively
> >> affect the foreground
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 5:51 AM, Marcos Caceres wrote:
>
> These look fantastic! so why not start with just those? Or are all those
> card types done and thoroughly tested on a good chunk of Web content? As I
> mentioned before, I'd be worried about the amount of error recovery
> code that will b
On 28/06/15 20:39, Randell Jesup wrote:
>>> I was under the impression that because e10s is only a single process for
>> all content (at least right now) a background tab can still negatively
>> affect the foreground tab.
>>
>> That's right, but we also tested e10s in the process-per-tab configurat
>> I was under the impression that because e10s is only a single process for
>all content (at least right now) a background tab can still negatively
>affect the foreground tab.
>
>That's right, but we also tested e10s in the process-per-tab configuration
There are other options for background tab
https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/fuel/fuelApplication.js#817
#include ../../toolkit/components/exthelper/extApplication.js
--
此致
礼
罗勇刚
Yours
sincerely,
Yonggang Luo
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.moz
10 matches
Mail list logo
