Re: Is that possible to port nodejs with gecko javascript engine?

2015-05-16 Thread Philip Chee
On 17/05/2015 02:06, Yonggang Luo wrote: > I've found Microsoft already done that. http://www.infoq.com/news/2015/03/JXcore-OpenSource JXcore is a Node.js Fork that supports multiple JS engines including Mozilla's Spidermonkey and Google's V8 http://oguzbastemur.blogspot.com/2015/02/now-asmjs-is

Re: Is that possible to port nodejs with gecko javascript engine?

2015-05-16 Thread voracity
On Sunday, May 17, 2015 at 4:06:49 AM UTC+10, Yonggang Luo wrote: > I've found Microsoft already done that. Are you referring to what's mentioned here: http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2408531/microsoft-confirms-it-will-make-nodejs-play-nice-with-window-10-because-iot ? Has Mozilla join

Re: Is that possible to port nodejs with gecko javascript engine?

2015-05-16 Thread Kyle Huey
zpao also did spidernode a few years ago before he left. - Kyle On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Lars Hansen wrote: > I believe JXCore has a version (listed as "beta") using our JS engine. > > --lars > > > On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 8:06 PM, Yonggang Luo wrote: > >> I've found Microsoft already d

Re: Is that possible to port nodejs with gecko javascript engine?

2015-05-16 Thread Lars Hansen
I believe JXCore has a version (listed as "beta") using our JS engine. --lars On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 8:06 PM, Yonggang Luo wrote: > I've found Microsoft already done that. > ___ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://

Is that possible to port nodejs with gecko javascript engine?

2015-05-16 Thread Yonggang Luo
I've found Microsoft already done that. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: Replacing Mozmill driven tests for Firefox with Marionette

2015-05-16 Thread Andrew Sutherland
On Fri, May 15, 2015, at 02:26 PM, Henrik Skupin wrote: > Yes, its a very outdated version of Mozmill from the hotfix-1.5 branch, > which we do not support since more than a year. Given that I have to add > that we cannot maintain something which is not in use at all. It's sad > to say but if somet

Re: Changing the style guide's preference for loose over strict equality checks in non-test code

2015-05-16 Thread Neil
Boris Zbarsky wrote: DOM constructors have an instanceof behavior that is global-agnostic. Well, window-agnostic; instanceof is harder to use in components or modules. -- Warning: May contain traces of nuts. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platfor

Re: Changing the style guide's preference for loose over strict equality checks in non-test code

2015-05-16 Thread Neil
Gijs Kruitbosch wrote: On 14/05/2015 18:12, Martin Thomson wrote: I have no idea what you are talking about. I have never had cause to use new String() anywhere. .toString() maybe. There are more than 1000 hits for "new String(" in MXR, so our codebase disagrees. Most if these are in JS

Re: Replacing Mozmill driven tests for Firefox with Marionette

2015-05-16 Thread Yonggang Luo
Maybe a generalize name is better? Such as xul-ui-tests? > Andrew Halberstadt wrote on 05/13/2015 04:24 PM: > > > I thought thunderbird was using a very out-of-date version of mozmill > > which was already unmaintained anyway? Or did you already upgrade to the > > latest version? > > Yes, its a

Re: Replacing Mozmill driven tests for Firefox with Marionette

2015-05-16 Thread Yonggang Luo
在 2015年5月16日星期六 UTC+8下午4:46:35，Yonggang Luo写道： > Maybe a generalize name is better? > Such as xul-ui-tests? > > Andrew Halberstadt wrote on 05/13/2015 04:24 PM: > > > > > I thought thunderbird was using a very out-of-date version of mozmill > > > which was already unmaintained anyway? Or did you