Re: Permission UI

2015-03-04 Thread Karl Dubost
Le 5 mars 2015 à 06:54, Jonas Sicking a écrit : > Also, we might want to do something similar for permissions. It's > somewhat annoying if a website can keep asking for geolocation by > simply using new subdomains to do so, even if the user repeatedly > clicks "no" and "remember this decision".

Re: Permission UI

2015-03-04 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 10:54 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > Also, we might want to do something similar for permissions. It's > somewhat annoying if a website can keep asking for geolocation by > simply using new subdomains to do so, even if the user repeatedly > clicks "no" and "remember this decisio

Re: Help needed: define Bugzilla components in moz.build files

2015-03-04 Thread Gregory Szorc
I was accidentally sorting based on bug component name, not the count of bugs. The spreadsheet has been updated. Sorry for the confusion. On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Botond Ballo wrote: > I see other wrongness in that spreadsheet, too. For example, for the > first file I cared to check, gfx

symbolapi downtime tomorrow noon PST (2015-03-04)

2015-03-04 Thread Robert Helmer
Hello, Per bug 1077633 we are taking symbolapi.m.o (used by the Gecko Profiler to do symbolication) down for preventative maintenance tomorrow at noon PST. Expected downtime is 1 hour. Thanks! Rob ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozill

Re: Help needed: define Bugzilla components in moz.build files

2015-03-04 Thread Botond Ballo
I see other wrongness in that spreadsheet, too. For example, for the first file I cared to check, gfx/layers/apz/src/APZCTreeManager.cpp, the spreadsheet gives "Firefox for Metro :: General" as the bug. However, I just checked, and out of the 80 bugs that touched the file since its creation, which

Re: Help needed: define Bugzilla components in moz.build files

2015-03-04 Thread Cameron McCormack
L. David Baron: > Having looked at the data for layout/, I think the results in the > spreadsheet are mostly wrong, and I'd rather not populate things > using it. A lot of the wrongness is files which weren’t updated recently, except for tree-wide changes such as introducing nullptr, which got fil

Re: Permission UI

2015-03-04 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Justin Dolske wrote: >> I don't actually think about:permissions is a good start, or that it's >> implemented "most of the complicated bits." Quite the opposite, really: it >> was a useful experiment, but

Re: Help needed: define Bugzilla components in moz.build files

2015-03-04 Thread L. David Baron
On Wednesday 2015-03-04 12:21 -0800, Martin Thomson wrote: > On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote: > > This spreadsheet contains a list of files and their most frequently > > associated bug component from commits landed since 2014. > > > > Is there any harm in automatically marking

Re: Help needed: define Bugzilla components in moz.build files

2015-03-04 Thread Martin Thomson
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote: > This spreadsheet contains a list of files and their most frequently > associated bug component from commits landed since 2014. > Is there any harm in automatically marking files based on this then having the community review and fix later?

Re: Help needed: define Bugzilla components in moz.build files

2015-03-04 Thread Gregory Szorc
Some quick updates. https://gecko.readthedocs.org/en/latest/build/buildsystem/mozbuild-symbols.html#mozbuild-subcontext-files now contains the full documentation on the "Files" type. These docs were truncated before. Included is differences between '*' and '**'. I have plans to stand up a web ser

Re: Permission UI

2015-03-04 Thread Justin Dolske
I don't actually think about:permissions is a good start, or that it's implemented "most of the complicated bits." Quite the opposite, really: it was a useful experiment, but has some serious problems. I'd briefly summarize the two main flaws as (1) "manager" UIs are generally not great (they provi