Re: Dropping support for MSVC2012

2015-01-03 Thread Francois Marier
On 04/01/15 19:28, Philip Chee wrote: > To me, the default answer to whether we should keep supporting MinGW > is "no", merely because it will require time and effort that will not > directly benefit our users as we do not use that compiler to release > Firefox. That is, without someone coming up

Re: Dropping support for MSVC2012

2015-01-03 Thread Philip Chee
On 03/01/2015 04:22, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > To me, the default answer to whether we should keep supporting MSVC2012 > is "no", merely because it will require time and effort that will not > directly benefit our users as we do not use that compiler to release > Firefox. That is, without someone

Re: What does the sameZoneAs option on the Cu.Sandbox do?

2015-01-03 Thread Bobby Holley
I forgot to mention that this also impacts regular garbage collection. In some cases, the GC will try to clean up just one zone (this is useful when you have one tab that generated lots of garbage while the rest of your tabs just sat there). When this happens, the GC has to assume that anything po

Re: What does the sameZoneAs option on the Cu.Sandbox do?

2015-01-03 Thread Naja Melan
Naja Melan: > ok, > > thanks, now it all makes sense ;) > Except for one thing. Sorry to be nitpicking, but the MDN page now says: sameZoneAs: A JavaScript object in whose garbage collection region the sandbox should be created in. This helps to improve memory usage by allowing sandboxes to be d