On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 4:11 AM, Naja Melan wrote:
> Does that mean that the globals of the content script will automatically
> be cleaned up if the tab is closed
No.
> or is it just a technicality of the GC and do you still have to do cleanup?
Correct (as in, you need to stop holding refere
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 2:34 AM, wrote:
> Supporting binary keys in IndexedDB is a proposed enhancement[1] to the
> standard, referred to some in the related discussion as
> "straightforward"[2]. Chromium has an implementation of this behind a flag.
>
> I'd like to potentially work on adding suppo
L. David Baron schrieb:
On Friday 2015-01-02 14:23 +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Seth Fowler schrieb:
On Dec 17, 2014, at 10:08 PM, James May wrote:
* Is there telemetry for this?
There isn’t telemetry specifically for non-MJPEG usage of
multipart/x-mixed-replace images. Given that I’ve nev
I'd say this is far enough out towards extreme edge case land that we
can be a bit more aggressive here compared to general feature
removals. So agreed.
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Seth Fowler wrote:
>
>> On Jan 2, 2015, at 7:16 AM, L. David Baron wrote:
>>> IMHO, "I haven't seen" is a weak
On 2015-01-02 5:04 PM, RyanVM wrote:
Are there any licensing/OS support/other issues that would encourage us to keep
support for MSVC2012 hanging around?
Both compilers support Windows 7 and above, and the express version of
both compilers is freely (as in beer!) available (MSVC2012 cannot be
On 2015-01-02 3:32 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2015-01-02 2:03 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
In this case, the problem is that I wrote a patch to explicitly
delete ("= delete") some members of classes in mozilla::pkix.
mozilla::pkix cannot depend on MFBT for licensing and build
ind
Are there any licensing/OS support/other issues that would encourage us to keep
support for MSVC2012 hanging around?
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
> On Jan 2, 2015, at 7:16 AM, L. David Baron wrote:
>> IMHO, "I haven't seen" is a weak argument. When we remove features
>> that are exposed to the web in some form, it's always a good idea to
>> gather some telemetry first so that we know what the actual impact
>> will probably be (there is som
Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> On 2015-01-02 2:03 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
>> In this case, the problem is that I wrote a patch to explicitly delete
>> ("= delete") some members of classes in mozilla::pkix. mozilla::pkix
>> cannot depend on MFBT for licensing and build independence reasons
>> (e.g. so it ca
On 2015-01-02 1:31 PM, Kent James wrote:
On 1/2/2015 6:23 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
Note that MSVC 2012 is "supported" in the sense that we'd accept patches
that help fix it, and we won't check in patches that require compiler
features that 2012 does not support. Traditionally people who use
co
On 2015-01-02 2:03 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
Ehsan wrote:
Note that MSVC 2012 is "supported" in the sense that we'd accept
patches that help fix it, and we won't check in patches that require
compiler features that 2012 does not support.
In this case, the problem is that I wrote a patch to explic
Ehsan wrote:
> Note that MSVC 2012 is "supported" in the sense that we'd accept
> patches that help fix it, and we won't check in patches that require
> compiler features that 2012 does not support.
In this case, the problem is that I wrote a patch to explicitly delete
("= delete") some members of
On 1/2/2015 6:23 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
Note that MSVC 2012 is "supported" in the sense that we'd accept patches
that help fix it, and we won't check in patches that require compiler
features that 2012 does not support. Traditionally people who use
compilers different than what we use on our
On Jan 2, 2015, at 12:37 PM, Eric Shepherd wrote:
>
> I've added a bit to
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Components.utils.Sandbox#Sandbox_options
> to cover this option. I see there are other not-yet-documented options, too,
> but I didn't get into them.
I also filed bug 1117143
On Jan 1, 2015, at 10:31 PM, Bobby Holley wrote:
>
> It indicates the GC region that the sandbox will be placed in. It has no
> effect on correctness, but memory usage will be better if globals which die
> at the same time are allocated in the same zone. This is why content
> scripts pass the win
I feel a lot less embarrassed about not finding that bug number now that I know
how long this thread has been running. :)
Eric Shepherd
Developer Documentation Lead
Mozilla
http://www.bitstampede.com/
> On Dec 30, 2014, at 12:25 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
>
> From the message at the start of th
Supporting binary keys in IndexedDB is a proposed enhancement[1] to the
standard, referred to some in the related discussion as "straightforward"[2].
Chromium has an implementation of this behind a flag.
I'd like to potentially work on adding support for this enhancement to Firefox,
but thought
On Friday 2015-01-02 14:23 +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote:
> Seth Fowler schrieb:
> >
> >>On Dec 17, 2014, at 10:08 PM, James May wrote:
> >>* Is there telemetry for this?
> >
> >There isn’t telemetry specifically for non-MJPEG usage of
> >multipart/x-mixed-replace images. Given that I’ve never seen
On 2015-01-02 4:36 AM, Kent James wrote:
On 1/1/2015 3:08 PM, Ryan VanderMeulen wrote:
Having just filed my fourth "MSVC2012 is busted" bug since we dropped
support for 2010 a few weeks ago, I'm wondering what the point of even
supporting 2012 is? Are there any licensing/OS support/etc advantage
Seth Fowler schrieb:
On Dec 17, 2014, at 10:08 PM, James May wrote:
* Is there telemetry for this?
There isn’t telemetry specifically for non-MJPEG usage of
multipart/x-mixed-replace images. Given that I’ve never seen them used outside
of our test suite, I don’t think we need telemetry to
I'm sorry, I'm a bit new to this, so the intricacies of the javascript scopes
and zones aren't yet very clear to me.
Does that mean that the globals of the content script will automatically be
cleaned up if the tab is closed or is it just a technicality of the GC and do
you still have to do cl
On 1/1/2015 3:08 PM, Ryan VanderMeulen wrote:
Having just filed my fourth "MSVC2012 is busted" bug since we dropped
support for 2010 a few weeks ago, I'm wondering what the point of even
supporting 2012 is? Are there any licensing/OS support/etc advantages to
keeping it around vs. just leaving 20
22 matches
Mail list logo
