On 09/24/2014 09:23 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
> So, it's not required to behave exactly the same everywhere; it simply
> codifies an author's intent. (OK, I suppose it *is* required to behave
> exactly the same everywhere in the case of "pixelated" & upscaling,
> since that requires a particular a
On 09/24/2014 06:26 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> Hmm, doesn't that basically allow non-interoperable implementations? :(
> I think Jonas' idea on having separate properties for the upscale vs.
> downscale cases is much better.
I'm unconvinced about the usefulness of exposing that much control. This
On 2014-09-24, 9:12 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
On 09/24/2014 09:32 AM, L. David Baron wrote:
Or, alternatively, it seems like the use case here would be
addressed by doing what the spec said before.
Following up more on this: the CSSWG has now resolved to *allow* (but
not require) the formerly-
On 09/24/2014 09:32 AM, L. David Baron wrote:
> Or, alternatively, it seems like the use case here would be
> addressed by doing what the spec said before.
Following up more on this: the CSSWG has now resolved to *allow* (but
not require) the formerly-required-by-spec prettier downscaling
behavio
The Web APIs documentation meeting is Friday at 10 AM Pacific Time (see
http://bit.ly/APIdocsMDN for your time zone). Everyone's welcome to
attend; if you're interested in ensuring that all Web APIs are properly
documented, we'd love your input.
We have an agenda, as well as details on how to
- Original Message -
> Hey folks,
>
> We already have the protobuf library in the tree, and it seems to be
> used for layer scope and webrtc.
>
> I'd like to use it for serializing heap snapshots in devtools code, but
> I have a couple questions:
>
> * How do I integrate the compilation
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Daniel Holbert
wrote:
> On 09/24/2014 07:38 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> >> This makes the implementation considerably simpler, which is great. It
> >> also means that "pixelated" will essentially just be a
> >> more-interoperable version of "-moz-crisp-edges", for
Hey folks,
We already have the protobuf library in the tree, and it seems to be
used for layer scope and webrtc.
I'd like to use it for serializing heap snapshots in devtools code, but
I have a couple questions:
* How do I integrate the compilation of the message description (.proto
file)
On 09/24/2014 07:38 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
>> This makes the implementation considerably simpler, which is great. It
>> also means that "pixelated" will essentially just be a
>> more-interoperable version of "-moz-crisp-edges", for the time being.
>
> So, what are we planning to do with -moz-cr
On 09/24/2014 09:32 AM, L. David Baron wrote:
> Or, alternatively, it seems like the use case here would be
> addressed by doing what the spec said before. Is it really that
> much harder to do?
No, it's not much harder.
> Is it just that we'd need to add another value to pass through
> variou
Yes!
Though as previously expressed, I don't think we should ship this until it
supports sending Blobs.
But we should definitely land preffed off as soon as patches are reviewed.
/ Jonas
On Sep 24, 2014 3:45 AM, "Andrea Marchesini"
wrote:
> Summary: (from the spec) Pages on a single origin ope
On Tuesday 2014-09-23 17:15 -0700, Justin Dolske wrote:
> On 9/23/14 4:24 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> >>This makes the implementation considerably simpler, which is great. It
> >>also means that "pixelated" will essentially just be a
> >>more-interoperable version of "-moz-crisp-edges", for the tim
On 24/09/14 14:27, Valentin Gosu wrote:
> On 24 September 2014 12:08, James Graham wrote:
>
>> On 24/09/14 02:11, Valentin Gosu wrote:
>>
>>> == Test coverage ==
>>> dom/tests/mochitest/general/test_resource_timing.html
>>> dom/tests/mochitest/general/test_resource_timing_cross_origin.html
>>>
>>
On 2014-09-23, 7:07 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
On 09/23/2014 02:56 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
FWIW, I also emailed www-style to sanity-check my understanding & to see
if there are any other reasons for this behavior-difference:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0340.html
Tu
On 24 September 2014 12:08, James Graham wrote:
> On 24/09/14 02:11, Valentin Gosu wrote:
>
> > == Test coverage ==
> > dom/tests/mochitest/general/test_resource_timing.html
> > dom/tests/mochitest/general/test_resource_timing_cross_origin.html
> >
> > There is also the w3c test, which presents s
Summary: (from the spec) Pages on a single origin opened by the same user in
the same user agent but in different unrelated browsing contexts sometimes need
to send notifications to each other, for example "hey, the user logged in over
here, check your credentials again".
For elaborate cases, e.
Summary: (from the spec) Pages on a single origin opened by the same user in
the same user agent but in different unrelated browsing contexts sometimes need
to send notifications to each other, for example "hey, the user logged in over
here, check your credentials again".
For elaborate cases, e.
On 24/09/14 02:11, Valentin Gosu wrote:
> == Test coverage ==
> dom/tests/mochitest/general/test_resource_timing.html
> dom/tests/mochitest/general/test_resource_timing_cross_origin.html
>
> There is also the w3c test, which presents some failures for all UAs
> because of bugs in the test.
> http
18 matches
Mail list logo
