When do we support old version of Visual Studio after switching to VS2013?
Now we still support VS2010 + SDK 7.1 as minimal requirement.
On 2014/08/22 15:27, David Major wrote:
We plan to switch the Windows build machines to Visual Studio 2013 on the
Firefox 35 train.
Some benefits from this
The e10s team has completed our M1 milestone to fix major pain points
for dogfood testing. Now it's time to dogfood! :)
To enable e10s, flip the "browser.tabs.remote.autostart" pref to true
and restart Nightly. (Please don't bother testing e10s in other Firefox
channels.) If you have any probl
A few thoughts.
- |mach build binaries| is awesome.
- The build team has a difficult job. Dealing with both "the build
system sucks" and "don't make me change my workflow" is hard. The real
wins will come when the build system is fully uncoupled from |make|,
which is a big task. glandium and froy
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 03:28:31PM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> > > I experience much longer build times on my Macbook Air:
> > > A no-op ./mach build binaries is 44 seconds.
> >
> > That can't be a no-op.
>
>
> Two builds one after the other give me:
> 18.639u 11.022s 0:40.86 72.5% 0+0k 34016+
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:24:53PM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> >
> > > On 8/22/14 9:08 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> > >
> > >> Unfortunately I don't really understand the reasons behin
On 8/25/14 3:06 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2014-08-25, 4:49 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
On 8/25/14 1:15 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
On Monday 2014-08-25 10:27 -0700, Bill McCloskey wrote:
Even if a full no-op build took no time, partial builds are still
useful. Often my workflow looks something li
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:24:53PM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
>
> > On 8/22/14 9:08 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> >
> >> Unfortunately I don't really understand the reasons behind this, but if
> >> you
> >> use this command, please know that i
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 06:06:17PM -0400, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> On 2014-08-25, 4:49 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> >On 8/25/14 1:15 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
> >>On Monday 2014-08-25 10:27 -0700, Bill McCloskey wrote:
> >>>Even if a full no-op build took no time, partial builds are still
> >>>useful.
On 2014-08-25, 4:49 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
On 8/25/14 1:15 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
On Monday 2014-08-25 10:27 -0700, Bill McCloskey wrote:
Even if a full no-op build took no time, partial builds are still
useful. Often my workflow looks something like this:
change files in directory D
rebu
On 8/25/14 1:15 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
On Monday 2014-08-25 10:27 -0700, Bill McCloskey wrote:
Even if a full no-op build took no time, partial builds are still useful. Often
my workflow looks something like this:
change files in directory D
rebuild only D, get a list of errors to fix
...it
- Original Message -
> On the other hand, if the build system automatically prioritized
> .cpp dependencies ahead of .h dependencies and just automatically
> built the things most likely to break first, I wouldn't have to
> worry about this at all.
I'd be satisfied with that as well.
> St
On Monday 2014-08-25 10:27 -0700, Bill McCloskey wrote:
> Even if a full no-op build took no time, partial builds are still useful.
> Often my workflow looks something like this:
>
> change files in directory D
> rebuild only D, get a list of errors to fix
> ...iterate until no more errors
> try
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> On 8/22/14 9:08 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately I don't really understand the reasons behind this, but if
>> you
>> use this command, please know that it doesn't work properly any more, even
>> if it seems to work in some cases.
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Daniel Veditz wrote:
> On 8/24/2014 6:21 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> > FWIW, to the best of my knowledge WebRTC calls do not require a click.
>
> But you have to click on the door-hanger to share camera/mic (or be on a
> site you have already trusted not to abuse
On 8/24/2014 6:21 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> FWIW, to the best of my knowledge WebRTC calls do not require a click.
But you have to click on the door-hanger to share camera/mic (or be on a
site you have already trusted not to abuse the permissions).
-Dan Veditz
___
On 2014-08-25, 2:22 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
On 8/25/14 11:00 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2014-08-25, 1:54 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
- Original Message -
Often my workflow looks something like this:
change files in directory D
rebuild only D, get a list of errors to fix
...iterate until
On 25/8/2014, 14:16, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
FWIW, I've often made changes like this when touching files like
nsCOMPtr.h or nsINode.h -- or switching nsresult from a typedef to an
enum class! -- and I find just doing ./mach build binaries works fine.
It reports errors randomly from all over the tree,
- Original Message -
> FWIW, I've often made changes like this when touching files like
> nsCOMPtr.h or nsINode.h -- or switching nsresult from a typedef to an
> enum class! -- and I find just doing ./mach build binaries works fine.
> It reports errors randomly from all over the tree, but t
On 8/25/14 11:00 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2014-08-25, 1:54 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
- Original Message -
Often my workflow looks something like this:
change files in directory D
rebuild only D, get a list of errors to fix
...iterate until no more errors
try to rebuild a few related d
- Original Message -
> > Strawman idea: add support for:
> >
> >mach check-syntax ...
>
> That will do nothing to reduce the overhead of the build system. Most
> of the errors that Bill is talking about can be found the first time the
> code is exercised by the compiler, so removing t
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Bill McCloskey wrote:
> Even if a full no-op build took no time, partial builds are still useful.
> Often my workflow looks something like this:
>
> change files in directory D
> rebuild only D, get a list of errors to fix
> ...iterate until no more errors
> try t
On 2014-08-25, 1:54 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
- Original Message -
Often my workflow looks something like this:
change files in directory D
rebuild only D, get a list of errors to fix
...iterate until no more errors
try to rebuild a few related directories, fixing errors there
then rebuil
- Original Message -
> Often my workflow looks something like this:
>
> change files in directory D
> rebuild only D, get a list of errors to fix
> ...iterate until no more errors
> try to rebuild a few related directories, fixing errors there
> then rebuild the entire tree, hopefully with
- Original Message -
> From: "Gregory Szorc"
> To: "Ehsan Akhgari" , dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 8:37:42 AM
> Subject: Re: PSA: ./mach build doesn't work reliably any longer
>
> The reason people do partial builds is because the full tree build isn't
>
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Justin Dolske wrote:
> On 8/22/14 10:17 AM, Hubert Figuière wrote:
>>
>> On 21/08/14 01:29 PM, Wesley Johnston wrote:
>>>
>>> Summary: We've had some complaints at times about videos autoplaying on
>>> mobile devices when sites request autoplay.
>
> [...]
>
>> Aut
On 8/25/14, 8:37 AM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
How fast do "no-op" / light builds need to be for |mach build
| to not exist?
About 10 seconds to compete with my usage[0] of |./mach build
| for hacking on devtools.
Of course, getting even faster is always appreciated ;)
[0] Actual command I ru
On 8/22/14 9:08 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
Unfortunately I don't really understand the reasons behind this, but if you
use this command, please know that it doesn't work properly any more, even
if it seems to work in some cases. AFAICT the workarounds are either doing
a full build or ./mach build
On 15/08/2014 12:55, Paolo Amadini wrote:
The major change would be the removal of the multiple search sources
from the autocomplete code, since this feature is used heavily by
Thunderbird. For Firefox, we already developed the UnifiedComplete
component that replaces the multiple searches in the
On 8/22/14 10:17 AM, Hubert Figuière wrote:
On 21/08/14 01:29 PM, Wesley Johnston wrote:
Summary: We've had some complaints at times about videos autoplaying on mobile
devices when sites request autoplay.
[...]
Autoplay waste bandwidth, whether mobile or wifi. In some case it is
more serious
29 matches
Mail list logo
