Build system changes to how library dependencies are declared

2014-07-22 Thread Mike Hommey
Hi, I just landed bug 1036894 and related bugs on mozilla-inbound. The short story is that things should now be less cumbersome. For most cases in the tree, where you want to add something to libxul, things are mostly unchanged: just add FINAL_LIBRARY = 'xul' or FINAL_LIBRARY = 'gkmedias

Re: Intent to Transition from TBPL to Treeherder

2014-07-22 Thread Joshua Cranmer 🐧
On 7/22/2014 8:01 PM, Jonathan Eads wrote: We’ve got lots of plans for useful bells and whistles in future releases, but the first step is reaching full feature parity with TBPL. We need to make sure sheriffs and developers can carry out business as usual. I'd love to play with it for my uses

Intent to Transition from TBPL to Treeherder

2014-07-22 Thread Jonathan Eads
Hello, TBPL (https://tbpl.mozilla.org) is Mozilla’s primary tool for visualizing and analyzing automated test data. It was a huge step forward when we transitioned from Tinder Box to TBPL, and it has allowed us to push forward with new products and platforms. Many thanks to all the Mozillians w

Re: fopen, gtest and try

2014-07-22 Thread Chris Pearce
Another use case here is we want to write GTests to test Gecko Media Plugins. These are the plugins we're using for EME and OpenH264 plugins. To load them we need to set an environment variable to the path of the directory in which the plugin dll resides, or pass that path to the plugin to a fu

Re: Intent to deploy: plugin timeout A/B test experiment, bug 1018200

2014-07-22 Thread Lawrence Mandel
I missed this earlier. Lacking any major concerns (Jet did express one), I approve the deployment of this experiment on Beta 32 on behalf of release management. Lawrence - Original Message - > This is an official notice of intent to deploy the experiment in bug > 1018200 to the beta cha

Re: Intent to implement: navigator.deviceStorage

2014-07-22 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
On 2014-07-22, 11:10 AM, Marco Chen wrote: Hi all, The purpose of this topic is to implement navigator.deviceStorage. Since Ehsan agreed with this proposal already, may I close this session? We still don't have a proposal yet, do we? It's fine to discuss this on dev-webapi too, but the discu

Re: Intent to implement: navigator.deviceStorage

2014-07-22 Thread Marco Chen
Hi all, The purpose of this topic is to implement navigator.deviceStorage. Since Ehsan agreed with this proposal already, may I close this session? The reason is 1. We didn't decide the resource and detail yet so I suggest to discuss it back to dev-webapi. And after we finalize the spec and