Hi all,
As of today, we run in parallel Windows 7 and Windows XP on iX hardware
as well as on minis.
Current status:
* Windows 7 on iX is running *visible* on FF23 based trees
* Windows XP on iX is running *hidden* on m-i, try and cedar
Sometime after Tuesday, I will:
* Evaluate and propose a
On Friday, May 17, 2013 10:40:12 AM UTC+2, Matthew Gertner wrote:
> Is there another way to make the panel invisible without destroying the
> nsIFrame?
For the record two people emailed me separately to suggest
panel.style.visibility = 'hidden'. This works fine. The only caveat is that I
still
[redirecting this to dev-platform only]
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
> On 5/16/2013 8:04 PM, Gavin Sharp wrote:
>
>> Bug 853071 landed in the Firefox 23 cycle, adding some defines that make
>> it possible to control when in the release cycle code is built.
>>
>> I've
On 5/16/2013 8:04 PM, Gavin Sharp wrote:
Bug 853071 landed in the Firefox 23 cycle, adding some defines that
make it possible to control when in the release cycle code is built.
I've described the various defines here:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Platform/Channel-specific_build_defines
My under
On Thursday, 16 May 2013 17:27:21 UTC+2, Matthew Gertner wrote:
> I have a toolbar button that displays a XUL panel when pressed. The panel
> contains an iframe into which an HTML page is loaded. To avoid "flicker", I'd
> like to defer display of the panel until the HTML page has finished loadin
On Friday, May 17, 2013 12:20:13 AM UTC+2, Neil wrote:
> display: none; destroys the nsIFrame object (in this case an
> nsMenuPopupFrame), thus closing the panel.
Is there another way to make the panel invisible without destroying the
nsIFrame?
I can't see how to open the popup after the conten
6 matches
Mail list logo
