On Fri 19 Apr 2013 04:27:22 PM PDT, Asa Dotzler wrote:
> On 4/19/2013 4:04 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Asa Dotzler wrote:
>>
>>> That would be great -- if we had a significantly larger Aurora
>>> population..
>>> Right now, the only way to get anything close
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Asa Dotzler wrote:
> I don't think it's that black and white. PDF.js and our new Cookie policy
> are both user facing features and web compat concerns that need a crap ton
> of compat testing.
Hmm, PDF.js yes, maybe click to play too.
But for cookie policy, Sh
On 4/19/2013 4:04 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Asa Dotzler wrote:
That would be great -- if we had a significantly larger Aurora population..
Right now, the only way to get anything close to decent "did we break the
web" testing is on our Beta channel.
I
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Asa Dotzler wrote:
> That would be great -- if we had a significantly larger Aurora population.
> Right now, the only way to get anything close to decent "did we break the
> web" testing is on our Beta channel.
>
I think Daniel was concerned about user-visible
On 4/19/2013 3:17 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
Would this mean that Beta-channel users would see some features appear
on release-day, and then disappear a couple weeks later, and then those
same features (plus maybe some new ones) would suddenly reappear on the
next release day, and then potentially
Would this mean that Beta-channel users would see some features appear
on release-day, and then disappear a couple weeks later, and then those
same features (plus maybe some new ones) would suddenly reappear on the
next release day, and then potentially disappear again? (etc)
This seems like it co
Reminder: rendering meeting this coming Monday! See below.
2013/4/13 Benoit Jacob
> Hello,
>
> The next Rendering meeting will take place *not* this Monday, but on
> Monday April 22 at 2:30 PM US/Pacific time. That could be Tuesday in your
> timezone.
>
> The Rendering meeting is about all thin
On 04/18/2013 03:50 PM, Jim Mathies wrote:
We have quite a few issues with touch enabled sites on Windows. [1] Our support
for touch stretches back to when we first implemented MozTouch events
which over time has morphed into a weird combination of W3C touch / simple
gestures support. It is rat
Johnathan and I also spoke about this last week, and we were going to sync up
with Gavin to work out details and find an owner for channel-specific
preference enables/disables. We'd only discussed having Nightly-only, up to
Aurora, and up to Beta. Up to early beta is a good addition.
Let me set
9 matches
Mail list logo
