On Tuesday 2013-03-19 14:34 -0400, Armen Zambrano G. wrote:
> Subject: Running Windows 8 tests visibly on mozilla-central, mozilla-inbound
> and try
>
> Besides three test suites (reftests, debug m-2 and debug m-o) all
> other jobs are running constantly green.
>
> If you want to read more about
On 3/19/2013 5:00 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> If I had to weigh in, I think existing manifests like xpcshell.ini
> work good enough and might be more readable and maintainable than
> managing everything in moz.build files. But, I'm ignorant of a lot of
> things, so maybe they aren't good enough.
>
N
On 3/19/13 11:57 AM, jmaher wrote:
The consensus is the master manifest solution is not of interest, are there
proposals and plans to remove:
testing/xpcshell/xpcshell.ini
testing/crashtest/crashtests.list
layout/reftest/reftests.list
This thread seems as though it is focusing on one of the 3 m
The consensus is the master manifest solution is not of interest, are there
proposals and plans to remove:
testing/xpcshell/xpcshell.ini
testing/crashtest/crashtests.list
layout/reftest/reftests.list
This thread seems as though it is focusing on one of the 3 master manifests.
As I am working to
Hi,
Besides three test suites (reftests, debug m-2 and debug m-o) all other
jobs are running constantly green.
If you want to read more about it visit
http://armenzg.blogspot.ca/2013/03/running-windows-8-tests-visibly-on-tbpl.html
best regards,
Armen
_
On 03/18/2013 09:45 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
On 3/18/2013 9:27 PM, Jeff Hammel wrote:
On 03/15/2013 11:33 AM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
Our build config has a number of areas where metadata is centrally
defined and a module or component's "configuration" is fragmented in
the source tree. Here are so
On 03/19/2013 07:33 AM, Joshua Cranmer 🐧 wrote:
On 3/18/2013 11:27 PM, Jeff Hammel wrote:
On 03/15/2013 11:33 AM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
Our build config has a number of areas where metadata is centrally
defined and a module or component's "configuration" is fragmented in
the source tree. Here a
jsmith.mozi...@gmail.com wrote:
I disagree on Calendar being on that list. Doing some Bugzilla diving shows
that the number of bugs filed in Calendar over the past month was around ~30 or
so bugs. That's less than the Gaia Calendar app itself (which is a Bugzilla
component)
Are these bugs f
I disagree on Calendar being on that list. Doing some Bugzilla diving shows
that the number of bugs filed in Calendar over the past month was around ~30 or
so bugs. That's less than the Gaia Calendar app itself (which is a Bugzilla
component) and is on the low end in comparison to other Bugzilla
On 03/19/2013 03:10 AM, jsmith.mozi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Taking in all of the feedback received, Byron came up with updated proposal in
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=851818#c3 that I think will
address the needs of the feedback provided here. If you have any addition
Note new meeting time: Tuesday, 19 March 2013, 16:00:00
Today's MemShrink meeting will be brought to you by this fixed bug:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=843733
The wiki page for this meeting is at:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Performance/MemShrink
Agenda:
* Discuss Images Memory
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 20:52:23 +0100, Anthony Ricaud wrote:
> On 18/03/13 17:39, L. David Baron wrote:
>> On Monday 2013-03-18 09:27 -0700, Jason Smith wrote:
>> I'd actually like to see Core higher on the list for the
>> no-canconfirm case. I think it's common for reasonably
>> well-informed Web de
On 3/18/2013 11:27 PM, Jeff Hammel wrote:
On 03/15/2013 11:33 AM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
Our build config has a number of areas where metadata is centrally
defined and a module or component's "configuration" is fragmented in
the source tree. Here are some examples:
3) xpcshell.ini master mani
On Tuesday, March 19, 2013 5:37:22 AM UTC-4, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> Cool name. However, are you actually proposing replacing, say, the reftest>
> manifest format with this format? It looks like it would be a lot more
> verbose.
My understanding is there is no need or plan to replace the refte
Cool name. However, are you actually proposing replacing, say, the reftest
manifest format with this format? It looks like it would be a lot more
verbose.
Rob
--
Wrfhf pnyyrq gurz gbtrgure naq fnvq, “Lbh xabj gung gur ehyref bs gur
Tragvyrf ybeq vg bire gurz, naq gurve uvtu bssvpvnyf rkrepvfr nhg
Hi Everyone,
Taking in all of the feedback received, Byron came up with updated proposal in
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=851818#c3 that I think will
address the needs of the feedback provided here. If you have any additional
comments, feedback, etc, please feel free to provide t
16 matches
Mail list logo
