Joshua Cranmer wrote:
> On 1/27/2013 11:48 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
> > FWIW, in cases like this, I would rather we just use the C++11 API
> > directly even if it means dropping support for common but
> > out-of-date compilers like gcc 4.4 and VS2010.
>
> I personally prefer an API style where the m
On 1/27/2013 11:48 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
Joshua Cranmer wrote:
In bug 732043, I want to add a mozilla::Atomic class
that lets us use C++11 atomics where available and fallback to
compiler intrinsics where C++11 atomics are not implemented
(which amounts to gcc 4.4 and Visual Studio 2010 or earl
Joshua Cranmer wrote:
> In bug 732043, I want to add a mozilla::Atomic class
> that lets us use C++11 atomics where available and fallback to
> compiler intrinsics where C++11 atomics are not implemented
> (which amounts to gcc 4.4 and Visual Studio 2010 or earlier).
How far are we from Visual Stu
Joshua Toon wrote:
> I know that there are probably well thought out reasons that this
> isn't a features already...BUT! Lot's of US Government users can't
> use Firefox because it doesn't use the Windows certificate store.
Please explain why NSS's trusted root store doesn't work for them. Is it
Our (ostensibly) weekly DOM bindings meetings continue on Monday January
28th at 12:30 PM PST.
Meeting details:
* Monday, January 28, 2012, 12:30 PM PST (9:30 PM CET)
* Conference room 7-N, San Francisco office, 7th floor.
* Dial-in Info:
- Vidyo room: SFO-7N
- In office or soft phone: extensio
5 matches
Mail list logo
