Re: Using anonymous namespace vs 'static'

2012-11-03 Thread Jason Duell
On 11/03/2012 02:20 PM, Justin Lebar wrote: Are there compiler annotations we could put on a class so that it behaves as though it's in an anonymous namespace but also plays nicely with the debugger? If so, maybe we should switch to those. Sure: "static" :) Jason ___

Re: Using anonymous namespace vs 'static'

2012-11-03 Thread Justin Lebar
> Since you can't refer to anonymous-namespace symbols at all in the Visual > Studio debugger, it also means you can't evaluate an expression containing a > cast to an anonymous-namespace class. That can also be a real pain, and > there's no workaround AFAIK. Wow. MSDN provides a possible work-ar

Re: Using anonymous namespace vs 'static'

2012-11-03 Thread Robert O'Callahan
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Justin Lebar wrote: > > Even worse, in Visual Studio 2010 (not sure about 2012), you can't set a > > breakpoint on an anonymous-namespace symbol *at all*. And we can't submit > > patches to fix that, either :-). > > Not even by opening the file and clicking to the

Re: Helloworld with xulrunner (yes sorry, again :)

2012-11-03 Thread richardson . balcacer
El sábado, 3 de noviembre de 2012 08:22:44 UTC-4, richardso...@gmail.com escribió: > I'm having the same issue on OSX and the template does not work for me. It > returns nothing. It seems to be a known bug you may find it at: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699966 I already put m

Re: Helloworld with xulrunner (yes sorry, again :)

2012-11-03 Thread richardson . balcacer
I'm having the same issue on OSX and the template does not work for me. It returns nothing. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform