Re: [magnolia-dev] Transactional Activation

2005-09-24 Thread Alexandru Popescu
#: Michael Aemisegger changed the world a bit at a time by saying on 9/22/2005 10:08 PM :# Alexandru Popescu wrote: Please add your comments to the above proposal. Your help is needed and highly appreciate. IMHO, there are 2 issues that are far more important than transactional activation:

Re: [magnolia-dev] Transactional Activation

2005-09-24 Thread Michael Aemisegger
Alexandru Popescu wrote: IMHO, there are 2 issues that are far more important than transactional activation: 1. preserve jcr UUIDs upon activation, so that UUIDs on author and public instance are the same. 2. incremental delivery Michael let's start 2 new threads about UUID preservation and

Re: [magnolia-dev] Transactional Activation

2005-09-24 Thread Alexandru Popescu
Here are some more things I have summarized from Charles, David and my posts: 1/ activation can be considered transactional per subscriber or per group of subscribers. Indeed this is from the point of view of functionality more generic than my initial proposal, but is not contradicting my algo

[magnolia-dev] [JIRA] Commented: (MAGNOLIA-540) problematic com.oreilly.servlet package license terms

2005-09-24 Thread Fabrizio Giustina (JIRA)
[ http://jira.magnolia.info/browse/MAGNOLIA-540?page=comments#action_11290 ] Fabrizio Giustina commented on MAGNOLIA-540: The new filter is now in svn, but it still can't replace the COS based one because it actually doesn't support multi-value

[magnolia-dev] breaking magnolia into small pieces

2005-09-24 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
... that means: let's start the separation of modules we discussed time ago. I would like to start refactoring the project layout in svn in order to separate the webapp from the core and the admin interface. While breaking those modules we will probably need to fix a few "forbidden" dependencies (

[magnolia-dev] [JIRA] Closed: (MAGNOLIA-529) Filenames with special characters produce 403

2005-09-24 Thread Fabrizio Giustina (JIRA)
[ http://jira.magnolia.info/browse/MAGNOLIA-529?page=all ] Fabrizio Giustina closed MAGNOLIA-529: -- Resolution: Duplicate duplicate of MAGNOLIA-529 > Filenames with special characters produce 403 > -

[magnolia-dev] [JIRA] Commented: (MAGNOLIA-529) Filenames with special characters produce 403

2005-09-24 Thread Michael Aemisegger (JIRA)
[ http://jira.magnolia.info/browse/MAGNOLIA-529?page=comments#action_11292 ] Michael Aemisegger commented on MAGNOLIA-529: - A task is always a duplicate of itself. But that's no reason to close it. Did you want to refer to another task? I rememb

[magnolia-dev] [JIRA] Commented: (MAGNOLIA-529) Filenames with special characters produce 403

2005-09-24 Thread Fabrizio Giustina (JIRA)
[ http://jira.magnolia.info/browse/MAGNOLIA-529?page=comments#action_11293 ] Fabrizio Giustina commented on MAGNOLIA-529: right :) duplicate of MAGNOLIA-532 > Filenames with special characters produce 403 > --

[magnolia-dev] jcr:uuid/mgnl:uuid replication

2005-09-24 Thread Alexandru Popescu
Hi! Sorry of re-starting this discussion, but as pointed by Michael this problem may have interactions with activation transactionability. Michael also pointed me to the previous related discussions: [1] mgnl:uuid vs jcr:uuid http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cms.magnolia.devel/3161 [2] Mai

Re: [magnolia-dev] jcr:uuid/mgnl:uuid replication

2005-09-24 Thread Michael Aemisegger
Alexandru Popescu wrote: However, by further researching the JSR170 API, there seems to be another way that allows also the replication of jcr:uuid over workspaces: clone-ing mechanism. This is specified in [7] 4.11.1.1 Relation Between Nodes and Version Histories (pg.36): [quote] If a versio

Re: [magnolia-dev] jcr:uuid/mgnl:uuid replication

2005-09-24 Thread Alexandru Popescu
Michael I think I am missing something: 1/ repositories cannot be distributed? what do you mean by this? is it a requirement to have Magnolia instance and repository instance on the same machine? (at most this can be a restriction of jackrabbit and not Magnolia). 2/ You would loose this advantage

Re: [magnolia-dev] breaking magnolia into small pieces

2005-09-24 Thread Alexandru Popescu
#: Fabrizio Giustina changed the world a bit at a time by saying on 9/24/2005 2:51 PM :# ... that means: let's start the separation of modules we discussed time ago. I would like to start refactoring the project layout in svn in order to separate the webapp from the core and the admin interfac