Re: [magnolia-dev] jeceira

2005-09-12 Thread Philipp Bracher
Hi Kristian Sorry for being late. It seems that Magnolia expects the underlying JCR implementation to make changes made in one session visible to all other sessions immediately on a save. We noticed while testing Magnolia with Jeceira that when you create a new page in Magnolia and then procee

Re: [magnolia-dev] [JIRA] Aktualisiert: (MAGNOLIA-540) problematic com.oreilly.servlet package license terms

2005-09-12 Thread Philipp Bracher
Cool I will check in later Philipp On 09.09.2005, at 11:13, Andreas Brenk (JIRA) wrote: [ http://jira.magnolia.info/browse/MAGNOLIA-540?page=all ] Andreas Brenk updated MAGNOLIA-540: --- Attachment: MultipartRequestFilter.java Okay, I replaced the Mu

Re: [magnolia-dev] Take a look at Jira 546

2005-09-12 Thread Philipp Bracher
THANKS, I noticed your effort, but was not able to test and check in yet. I will do this as soon I have time. Philipp On 09.09.2005, at 16:38, Felipe Curty do Rego Pinto wrote: Hi people,   I posted that issue into Jira. It is solved.   Take a look, I fixed two bugs into magnolia and now it

Re: [magnolia-dev] Clue Creating a Page

2005-09-12 Thread Philipp Bracher
The pages are created in the tree handler which uses the tree control. See: - info.magnolia.module.admininterface.AdminTreeMVCHandler.createNode() - info.magnolia.cms.gui.control.Tree.createNode(String label, String itemType) Philipp On 10.09.2005, at 16:31, Felipe Curty do Rego Pinto wrote:

Re: [magnolia-dev] Security Roles and Roles Provider

2005-09-12 Thread Philipp Bracher
1) Change the combo (Read only, Read/Write, Deny) for a group of checkbox with all the access (add, set, remove, write, syndicate, read) May be, it allow a more flexible security structure. Yep!   2) Add the possibility of a role provider. It would be a configuration that able you to hand

Re: [magnolia-dev] jeceira

2005-09-12 Thread Michael Aemisegger
Philipp Bracher wrote: It seams that jackrabbit does not always update the session properly (there are maybe still some bugs), perhaps we can change to the model you proposed. see http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-155 Hopefully this bug is fixed. However, I still suffered from this bug

[magnolia-dev] [JIRA] Commented: (MAGNOLIA-540) problematic com.oreilly.servlet package license terms

2005-09-12 Thread Fabrizio Giustina (JIRA)
[ http://jira.magnolia.info/browse/MAGNOLIA-540?page=comments#action_11265 ] Fabrizio Giustina commented on MAGNOLIA-540: Just a comment: I already tried replacing cos with commons-fileupload months ago, during the dependencies cleanup work, but

Re: [magnolia-dev] jeceira

2005-09-12 Thread Philipp Bracher
It seams that jackrabbit does not always update the session properly (there are maybe still some bugs), perhaps we can change to the model you proposed. see http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-155 The fix is very new (7. September) Hopefully this bug is fixed. However, I still suffered

Re: [magnolia-dev] jeceira

2005-09-12 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
On 9/12/05, Michael Aemisegger wrote: > Hopefully this bug is fixed. However, I still suffered from this bug, although > in the magnolia build, maven claims to download a jackrabbit-snapshot.jar. > > Which jackrabbit version does maven download? I didn't get it. I remember > Fabrizio having said,

[magnolia-dev] [JIRA] Aktualisiert: (MAGNOLIA-540) problematic com.oreilly.servlet package license terms

2005-09-12 Thread Andreas Brenk (JIRA)
[ http://jira.magnolia.info/browse/MAGNOLIA-540?page=all ] Andreas Brenk updated MAGNOLIA-540: --- Attachment: MultipartRequestFilterTest.java A first go at a JUnit test case. > problematic com.oreilly.servlet package license terms >

Re: [magnolia-dev] jeceira

2005-09-12 Thread Michael Aemisegger
Fabrizio Giustina wrote: In the past we were used to link the snapshot version in project.xml but this becomes problematic when changes in jackrabbit require a change to the repository configuration file (and this will happen again soon, due to the restructuring that's going on for the jackrabbit

[magnolia-dev] [JIRA] Kommentiert: (MAGNOLIA-540) problematic com.oreilly.servlet package license terms

2005-09-12 Thread Andreas Brenk (JIRA)
[ http://jira.magnolia.info/browse/MAGNOLIA-540?page=comments#action_11267 ] Andreas Brenk commented on MAGNOLIA-540: I forgot: the test case uses commons-httpclient 3.0-rc3. So you have to update the dependency. Multi-value properties are not yet

Re: [magnolia-dev] jeceira

2005-09-12 Thread Michael Aemisegger
Philipp Bracher wrote: It seams that jackrabbit does not always update the session properly (there are maybe still some bugs), perhaps we can change to the model you proposed. see http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-155 The fix is very new (7. September) Any chance to upgrade to the

Re: [magnolia-dev] jeceira

2005-09-12 Thread Philipp Bracher
Does jeceira follow the copy-on-read strategy? No and that's the problem. Should we be compatible to such repositories too? Sorry for the hasty reading: Jeceira uses copy-on-read! To avoid any confusion: jackrabbit follows copy-on-write Yes, I know. Philipp, from your statement I conclude

Re: [magnolia-dev] jeceira

2005-09-12 Thread Kristian Duske
Hi Philipp, This is true: see info.magnolia.cms.security.SessionAccessControl But I think you can patch easily the methods: Then you must patch ContentRepository.getHierachieManager too. See below - the change is really minimal. I think, we should not do this, since this would not solve t

[magnolia-dev] [JIRA] Created: (MAGNOLIA-548) Ampersand can not be edited properly in tree column 'title'

2005-09-12 Thread Michael Aemisegger (JIRA)
Ampersand can not be edited properly in tree column 'title' --- Key: MAGNOLIA-548 URL: http://jira.magnolia.info/browse/MAGNOLIA-548 Project: magnolia wcm Type: Bug Components: gui-admin Versions: 2.1 Fi